Contraindications of Islamist Dominance if Iranian Islamic Regime's Tact to Nuclear Strength Wins

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Dec 8, 2021 at 15:13

What is one to expect, that if the Iranian Islamic Regime's ploys to wins acknowledgement, if not agreement, that its determination to achieve nuclear domination in defiance and diffidence to American and Israeli objections in their supposed strongest terms (the EU/UN positions notwithstanding), is fulfillment of threats to disrupt any further posing of the Iranian threat going to present those possibilities of force? Or does the opposing efforts extend beyond what has already been disposed and the opportunities once expected of the Abrahamic accords move from dreams of economic expectations to collaborations of military/industrial investments to keep Iranian Islamic Regime's ambitions of empire restrained in spite of the nuclear threat.
After all the posturing, there is no real status quo as long as neither side continues to operate oblivious to the real perceptions of threat to peace in the region: what to do about Israel if it all falls apart?
More importantly, what is Israel ready to do without American support?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".