Sharia can preclude even positive reassessments of Muhammad

Submitted by Dave (United States), Feb 24, 2022 at 14:12

Modern historical research based on documents from the seventh century establishes some marked variances with canonical Islam. Among these are some very positive observations about Muhammad, mainly involving his religious inclusiveness and tolerance. Originally, a "Believer" was simply any monotheist. The research also shows some dramatic historical differences from the canonical sources, such as the absence of the formalization of the Islamic religion at that time (Muhammad was not a Muslim and did not establish a religion, although he was considered a prophet), as well as the geographical location of Muhammad and his followers more likely having been around Petra in Jordan, rather than Mecca (based on topological descriptions in the Koran as well as the directional orientation of ancient mosques.
The shame is, the later introduction of Sharia prohibitions on criticizing Islamic orthodoxy as blasphemous prevents the modification of Islam based on modern research, even if the modifications paint Muhammad in a positive light. Sad, because despite the fact that Muslims claim to revere Muhammad, they would still resist new evidence even if it boosted Islamic prestige and led to more pro-social and peaceful practices. It's the curse of the bitter clingers.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".