Some of replies to loony radical pretending to be upset about a human shield girl killed with Jihadi butcher Taysir al-Jabari

Submitted by Miranda (United States), Aug 6, 2022 at 21:20

Aug 6, 2022

E...
Replying to @Ranin_Boulos

When innocent citizens are used to be a human shield then it is very sad. I think you also know that they are not looking for 5-year-old children there. They are looking for murderers like Jabari. Are you uncomfortable?! cope!

Gee
Replying to @Ranin_Boulos

It's a shame that the arch-terrorist who was next to her didn't ask her if she wanted to be a human shield or not, in any case 90 percent, her brothers would have murdered her because she talked to a boy...

Y

Replying to @Ranin_Boulos

It is easy. When I go to the reserves, I don't take a 5-year-old child with me "to work" and my wife as a human protector. informative?

The Voice of...
Replying to @uriweltmann
Why... because her parents brought her and raised her to be a human shield for terrorists.

That's why

O:
Probably served as a human shield for terrorists and a not so successful shield if I may..

I. A.

Simply amazing, in every operation or war, all the wretched worms who are proud of progress come out of their burrows and start lamenting every terrorist killed or every human shield injured. Do yourself a favor, swallow the scum you shamelessly dish out on our children and return to your holes.

Y.P.
True, because of course the IDF intended to kill her
Haven't you realized yet that the terrorists of your "nation" use children as human shields?
The operation is directed against the terrorists only and the vulnerabilities are surgical against the terrorist elements.

M
You forgot to thank the terrorist that she served as a human shield for him...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".