Selling the Western civilization

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Jan 5, 2006 at 17:58

Rachelle assouline wrote ,

> However, do you know that at the same time the Deutch Bank in Germany has instituted an Islamic law of banking!

Well , dear Rachelle, for 350 000 000 000 Euro the Germans (as all other Westerners ) would sell their souls to the Devil himself, let alone to "peaceful" , "tolerant" and so rich sheikhs and ayatollahs. Can you believe that for those people the Western civilization has got any deeper value?...If they were paid 400 000 000 000 they would probably defend the West. But who will pay such a high price to save this civilization ? The bosses of the companies that make a fortune by strengthening its worst enemies ?

[ At present Iran is the most important market for the German companies in the whole of the Near and Middle East. In 2004 Germany imported to Iran commodities in the value of more than 3, 5 billion Euro. Since 2000 their size had doubled." - from an official German source ]

The more I think about it, the more I am convinced that it is not so much the leftist doctrinaires that are at the core of the present problems. To use Marxist/Stalinist terms I would call them just an ideological oversturucure of some more basic structure that have been created by other anti-left forces still at work. It is various Western moneyed interests that profit from the rise and spread of Islam that are the real problem of the West. They see their chance to earn huge money by ruining this Western world. Selling (in the literal sense of the world) the West to Islam is the core problem. And who sells the West? Look at where these 350 000 000 000 Euro go and you will know .

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".