one more reply to Aidan

Submitted by G.Bisvas (Germany), Jan 9, 2006 at 05:51

To Aidan I wish to say:

1) I don't think liberal muslims can or want to protect us against islamo-fascists. 2) In reality, liberal muslims have to give protection to islamo-fascists – they have no other choice. They dare not deny safe haven to the islamo-fascists. 3) "civilised" in the west – does it mean we have to keep talking a language that muslims do not understand? 4) How many examples of liberal muslims do you know who took risks to protect non-muslims successfully? 5) Even muslim liberals profit from the gains made by islamo-fascists and islamic invaders and conquerors. I know of no muslim liberal who talks of returning the snatched goods (lands, peoples, resources etc.) to the non-muslims.

Is Aidan M. a secret islam sympathiser?
Muslims classify terrorists into four categories: 1) their terrorists (this includes the non-muslim states), 2) our terrorists. The second category is further classified into: a) terrorists who were useful in the past but are no more useful today, b) terrorists who are useful today (but may not be useful in future), c) terrorists to be protected, because they will be useful in future.
Muslims want to define terrorism in such a way as to eliminate only 1) and 2)a).

G.Bisvas

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".