response to infidel

Submitted by Harrak (Canada), Jan 16, 2006 at 17:24

My friend "infidel' as you named yourself in your comment, I want to answer your question on who I am. I am the son of man who is interested in Middle East politics .B.A poli scie and religion and M.A philosophy in progress. Read the news in 3 languages. Follower of what the following news agencies bradcast regularily: Aljazeera, CNN, TVA, TV5, AlAlam, BBC, IRNA, IRIB, 2M. I do not need to know who you are much as I need to reply to your comment.

Daniel Pipes in this website has established a University like learning place. I do not doubt about his knowledge of the subject matter but I reserve my natural right to academically disagree with him.

I personally as researcher asked Daniel for the source and that is a legitimate question. If no sourse, that let us insert the fact as allegation not as an argument pillar. You see when I said that Goerge bush who said he saw Jesus I put it between ( ) and not between " ". So if you can look at it academically you will find that the signage signifies something that is commonly said but not asserted as totally authentic. If daniel put what he said as something between ( ), than I would accept that as marginal argument fortifying factor..

Now to your last quest, I said that Shiite will never go to war -my opinion that I do need to foot note- Yes, I believe so, why? here are some tips:

1- In contrast to you saying: suicide bombers in Iraq are shites etc.. I say that suiside bombers in Iraq are the immediate manufactury of the United States alliance with the axis of ignorance. Most if not all terrorist ops in Iraq are done by Sunnis (refer to any news archive US or abroad) coming from S. Arabia the heartland of Terror. You can ask yourself who trained Arab US made terrorists fueld by Arabian oil money to fight in Afghanistan. Yesterday in CNN they were Mujahedeen, and today they are terrorists. I do not know about your age to ask you if you remember.

2- 1980-1988 War. no one ignores that Iraq started the war and was boosted by German and French Chemical weapons, full Arab support and US blessing... So this is invalid for you to use in the discussion.

3- Ahmadinajad says Wipe Irael out of the Map. Yes, but that is a psycologiocal warfare if you have not heard of it before. Did not the grand Rabai Obedia Joseph of Israel say that Arabs are insects that should be wiped out..So Tic for Tac is logical.

Shiites will never go to war. Again I re-assert that going to war especially on an international scale is against Shiism which is based on the comming of their mahdi. This mahdi's precondition of comming is the earth to be filled of injustice not of shiites..The west has rather take care of two states in the middle east and asia that are most dangereous. two states and only two -my opinion- Pakistan and Israel.

India -I believe- is culturally incapable of lauching a nuclear attack and the same for N.Corea as it is fully controlled by China that plays with it as a card like the US plays with Thiwan. If the world is to demilitarize a state than nothing is ever more dangereous than Pakistan and Israel.

In general, I hope the inpossible. So I'd rather say I dream to live in a nuclear free world.


Thank you very much

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".