69 million page views

Unilateral Disengagement

Reader comment on item: The Wisdom of Ehud Olmert – A Dreamy Return to Oslo

Submitted by Neil Goldstein (United States), Jan 17, 2006 at 16:03

One we recognize the anarchy overwhelming the Palestinian polity, there is but one conclusion reasonable people can finally reach. Israel's withdrawal from Gaza started as a gambit to improve Israel's security by separating dangerous Gaza from Israel. It relied on much of the same logic that underlies Israel's construction of a security fence to separate Israelis from terrorists in the West Bank. Formulated when Arafat still was alive, this policy of "disengagement" assumed that there was no Palestinian partner for peace. Israel was willing to simultaneously accept the Bush "Roadmap," which assumed the opposite, only because of Israel's trust in President Bush and because the Roadmap required no major new concessions on Israel's part until the Palestinians proved themselves to really be such partners.

Sadly, events of this past year have proven proponents of disengagement right: there are no Palestinian partners capable of ending terrorism and making peace with Israel. Much of Europe and some in Washington have been slow to come to this conclusion. But it is a conclusion that the vast majority of Israelis came to long ago, and that we have long counseled.

In the absence of such a partner, it is the consensus of Israeli politics that disengagement is the only viable option and that is the course that Israel will need to pursue in the months and years ahead. While Ariel Sharon had the might and will to see this through, Mr. Olmert's initial statements indicate that he will follow through with the only viable option left.

Sincerely,

Executive Director: Neil B Goldstein

President: Paul S. Miller
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

Let us make an appointment to review the situation in, say, five years and see how things look then.

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (11) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
RETURN GILAD HOME PLEASE!!!! [128 words]lioraJan 17, 2009 19:23148305
G-d as the only leader. [49 words]YnnatchkahNov 24, 2007 02:38114580
The collective self- saboteur [244 words]MikeNov 19, 2007 10:40114015
This is war, not a garden party [60 words]jennifer solisNov 16, 2007 15:34113885
The Ultimate Fool [95 words]JW DickinsonMay 3, 2007 22:4591574
Unfortunately, Olmert, Peretz and Livni are the wrong politicians to lead the State of Israel at the Wrong Time. [113 words]RichardNov 1, 2006 10:5464993
Unilateral Disengagement [260 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Neil GoldsteinJan 17, 2006 16:0331836
Predicting the future in Israel. [124 words]ElmoJan 10, 2006 09:4131384
Olmert's statement [93 words]Ed KatzJan 9, 2006 13:2931348
The Israeli Politicos have betrayed their brave founders and pioneers [311 words]Jeff BercovitchJan 7, 2006 13:1631234
The Disengagement brainstorm.... [79 words]Jacob MandelblumJan 6, 2006 07:3531172

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)