Your talks in Melbourne

Submitted by MICHAEL BURD (Australia), Apr 5, 2006 at 02:27

Daniel,

Once again I enjoyed your talk in Melbourne last week and agree with your views with regards to the Israel Palestinian "War" regardless of what M.L .said....

I asked you if the the mass immigration by way of asylum seekers, refugees and high birth rates of Muslims around the world including Australia where they are increasing more than any other minority were part of the Islamic worlds plan which includes intimidation and encouraging their host countries politicians by their shear numbers . to alienate America and Israel [and to have Jews living around the world under seige] which has already happened.

You didn't agree, however I still point out to you that in every country where Muslims have increased their numbers i.e. Germany, France, Holland, Scandanavia, canada for example the governments and majority of populations have turned against Israel and America. This is no coincidence...and all these countries used to be good friends of Israel,surely their numbers as far as votes count must influence the Politicans?

You said it was the leftists that were the ones responsible for these changes of attitudes however Daniel don't for get the Muslims and lefists are allies, they both have the same agenda.

I also asked you if you thought that any future American governments would ever change their allegiances and stop supporting Israel {i.e. if Another peanut farmer" look a like" ever came into power ]. 50 % of American Jews are marrying out and the Muslim population is increasing dramatically, will Israel ever be sacrificed to appease Muslim worldwide violence?

Keep up the good work Daniel ...

Michael

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".