Meisenheimer & Walt's characterization of Campus Watch

Submitted by Yzoleowl (United States), Jun 29, 2006 at 21:08

Meisenheimer and Walt's version of Daniel Pipes' report sees a plot when the honest reporting points out the fallacies of their statements. Don't question our report - it is gospel, anyone who points out the inconsistencies is a plotter with connections who is out to get us. Disregarding the facts and warning critics with rebuttal of our findings is an enemy attacking Academia, - read "Don't question members of Academia - we're always right, objective and truthful, and if anyone has the temerity to shine a strong light on our thesis and show the inconsistencies, the glossing over of half-truths or pointing out exaggerations and false conclusions, that is the enemy and we'll say anything to discredit him." And these are our children's teachers?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".