69 million page views

Christian and Secular Humanist Council of Saudi Arabia- how many minutes would that survive?

Reader comment on item: More Special Privileges for Muslims

Submitted by Dr Nicholas Beecroft (United Kingdom), Aug 3, 2006 at 11:20

When the British first turned up in their countries, the Chinese and Muhgal(Indian) Emperors, were skeptical and condescending. A hundred years later, the British ruled India and had brought mighty China to her knees.

In 2006, Britain and the West are similarly arrogant and complacent in the face of our future imperial masters. Our establishment falls over itself to appease colonist organisations like the Muslim Council of Great Britain.

Perhaps we should put thus to the test by forming a Secular Humanist Council of Saudi Arabia? How successful would that be? They could call for mass immigration of Christians and Secular Humanists into Saudi Arabia. These immigrants would of course need to be fully equal to Saudis, positively encouraged to pursue their own culture, offered free accommodation and benefits and to be protected from criticism or discrimination of any kind. I wonder if the Saudi government would help us build churches all over the country and establish universities to teach secularism, democracy, science, the rule of law and freedom?

How about a Liberal Democrat Council of Sudan? They could march through Khartoum with placards saying "Death to Non-Christians" or "God will kill the enemies of Multicultural Utopia." They could hold hands and wave flowers at the marauding militias, asking them not to chain up, burn and rape the Darfur villagers.

Hmmm. Not many volunteers for that plan I guess. So why are we hate ourselves so much that we are allowing ourselves to be colonised and prepared for our Dhimmitude-slavery?

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (9) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Dr. Pipes evasion [177 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ralph C Whaley MDAug 7, 2006 11:3951852
Common now... [115 words]Bob RosenAug 7, 2006 10:4051849
No establishment clause in Oz [53 words]Dan Schwartz (Cherry Hill, NJ)Aug 7, 2006 08:1251837
Christian and Secular Humanist Council of Saudi Arabia- how many minutes would that survive? [250 words]Dr Nicholas BeecroftAug 3, 2006 11:2051596
Islamic Imperialism [355 words]Dr Nicholas BeecroftAug 3, 2006 11:1751595
Yeah and [56 words]StatingtheObviousAug 7, 2006 16:4551595
Foolish Comments [58 words]InfidelAug 7, 2006 23:0951595
Very Pity [79 words]Muhammad AriefJul 22, 2006 01:0850515
Very Pity [125 words]Jeff in KabulAug 5, 2006 11:2850515

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)