Missed points by the commentator

Submitted by author of the commented article (Australia), Nov 23, 2006 at 07:22

For peace and prosperity!

The commentator (Mr. Terry) tried so good to dig away to the truth that if he studies what happened to 9/11 conspiracy according a fellow Dave Vonksleist in the 911 In Plane Site Documentary (http://www.thepowerhour.com) that its not anymore a theory (although he avoided to draw conclusion)... thus said "How many evidence should we need to tell us what is really there..." and added "...There are several networks involved in the ostentation of evidence and is it safe to assume that they have guilt on it?" maybe because the good governance of US never wanted to approve such documentary and never give license to it" whereas there are many points really terribly putting color to the picture that truly the work of satan has just been trying to conceal the clear fact. Like the Pentagon being not hit with a 767 airline and the planes struct the 2 towers were no US jet liners. The pull out of the buildings... The huge explosion blast of the buildings... Like a detonation of demolition charges floor by floor... according to the men & women on the site of being interviewed by several news angencies. A pancake collapse... said by firefighters and officers.

Now, Mr Terry may look back to this reply. I as a brother wish God open his senses and hope he would be englightened to this fact coming from the mouth and videos of the said country directly affected.

Please see the DVD first and try not to put more discrimination to the messenger rather pay attention to the message.

My question is HOW CAN A WAY OF LIFE LIKE ISLAM OR SAY A RELIGION (IN ITS SENSE) DO SUCH NO-CONSCIENCE ACT. that in order to make a world drama uses innocent lives to heap up the trauma and claim a war that until now no WMD evidence has been produced but the DAMAGES HAD BEEN DONE!

Now Muslims are very careful of scrutiny. Thus is it brother Terry's intention to question the comment and would like to make a statement that MY COMMENT is a JUSTIFICATION to JIHAD? Truly it is a fact that a non-Believer will comment as expected. Because Jihad is striving and it has 2 categories: The greater jihad is against your baser self desires and the Least jihad is this expensive war. Now who in the right mind would go for corpes-piling activity when one knows that this life is temporary and the eternal life is the hereafter and Who was taught by his Creator that to kill a fellow human is like killing a nation? What do you think?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".