Brilliant analysis, as usual :: Reader comments at Daniel Pipes

Submitted by Maryallene Otis (United States), May 21, 2003 at 09:50

I hope that others will do what I plan to, which is to call the White House comment line, the State Department, and my congresspeople. I will be encouraging them to take action to promote support of the MEK, as it is clearly in the best interest
of United States security.

Like Dislike

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment Next Comment >>

Reader comments (39) on this item

	Title	Commenter	Date	Thread
	Finally the UK is taking the MEK off of the terrorist lists; can the USA be that far behind? [20 words]	Whitneymuse	Dec 16, 2007 21:24	116298
1	MEK are not terrorists [27 words]	from the heart of Tehran	Aug 11, 2007 23:31	105942
	Why we should not support the MEK [553 words]	Arash Pertani	Sep 12, 2006 12:02	55689
	On MEK a Muslim Organization [41 words]	Ali Agha	Dec 11, 2005 20:08	29782
1	MeK; Don't worry [210 words]	A Soldier	Jan 25, 2004 10:00	13532
	Hear, hear, shahin [71 words]	Peter J. Herz	Oct 14, 2003 04:42	11789
	MEK-Our Ally?? [248 words]	Shahin Shadmer	Aug 19, 2003 00:06	10627
	Terrorists or just a terrorist tag? [234 words]	M. H. Jazayeri	Jul 22, 2003 19:20	10145
	The Gullible Western Civ. [251 words]	Darwin Barrett	Jul 6, 2003 20:21	9900
	about MEK [226 words]	Max Rose Rastgaran	Jul 3, 2003 19:48	9876
	The enemy of your enemy isn't necessarily your friend [115 words]	Temur Khan	May 31, 2003 08:15	9310
	Good terrorists? [27 words]	Boris Gurevich	May 26, 2003 11:45	9243
	Democratic secular government [44 words]	S.C.Panda	May 26, 2003 07:27	9242
	Playing with fire? [97 words]	Pat Kunz	May 24, 2003 11:19	9219
	Terrorist allies or business as usual? [123 words]	R.D. Crockett	May 23, 2003 11:12	9204
	MEK are terroriosts [38 words]	moe	May 22, 2003 07:16	9177
	TV station. [56 words]	Yousef Safa	May 22, 2003 00:48	9172
	Common Sense [81 words]	Brent W. Burnette	May 22, 2003 00:35	9171
	future allies? [38 words]	Alan Sullivan	May 21, 2003 21:36	9169
	Terrorism is terrorism no matter who's the target [307 words]	Mike Rudwian	May 21, 2003 17:32	9167
	shame!! [104 words]	sam	Nov 4, 2006 09:40	9167
	Enough machinations [187 words]	endurnz	May 21, 2003 14:30	9165
	A Terrorist U.S. Ally? [14 words]	TL Miller	May 21, 2003 14:21	9164
	This is too small a definition of terrorism. [107 words]	Bill Smith	May 21, 2003 13:52	9163
1	MEK and facts. [259 words]	Yousef Safa	May 21, 2003 13:49	9162
	MEK [39 words]	Massood	May 21, 2003 12:06	9161
	Supporting the MEK, but at what expense? [199 words]	Safa Haeri	May 21, 2003 10:55	9155
1	The Enemy of Our Enemy is NOT Necessarily Our Friend [70 words]	Kenneth Stahl	May 21, 2003 10:05	9152
	Brilliant analysis, as usual [50 words]	Maryallene Otis	May 21, 2003 09:50	9151
	Excellent [4 words]	Maureen Thompson	May 21, 2003 09:02	9150
	Sounds like trouble [265 words]	Robert Koslover	May 21, 2003 00:49	9148
	MEK [172 words]	Michael Podgoetsky	May 20, 2003 21:51	9145
	A rose is a rose is a rose..... [78 words]	Roy Weeks	May 20, 2003 20:52	9144
	MEK: Terrorist or Legitimate Iranian Resistance [402 words]	Shahin Mohammadi	May 20, 2003 20:19	9142
	Monopoly on the use of violence [93 words]	Marc Baron	May 20, 2003 20:09	9141
	A Terriorist U.S. Ally [84 words]	Jean	May 20, 2003 19:49	9140
	MEK, friend or foe? [178 words]	David Wigotski	May 20, 2003 18:44	9139
	On MEK [239 words]	Ali J	May 20, 2003 13:11	9134
	Thank you [18 words]	Dan Gurta	May 20, 2003 11:06	9131