Reply to Racism

Submitted by A.A. (Canada), Jun 6, 2007 at 18:45

You have truly proven yourself to be a typical ignorant person... . First of all, what exact proof do you have of this Muslim "agenda", as only 5 or 10 people do not count as a whole race. Secondly, you talk of the West offering equal rights and liberty to all religions, not simply Christians. Let me name a few examples of something countering that claim.

Firstly, America, in every aspect, discriminates against racial minorities, even the universities greatly consider a person's racial background before accepting them, no matter what their grades and qualifications may be, and people considered to be of the "best" background, a.k.a. White, are accepted often. Secondly, in France, another western country, has banned religious headgear, a.k.a. the Hijab worn by Muslim females. Great Britain also has similar foreign policies; visitors and applicants for immigration of certain backgrounds are not permitted to enter, or face tighter security than the Caucasian population.

As to counter your comment about these so-called "terrorist cells", they are religious institutions where people go to pray, and it is not allowed in Islam for them to be used for any other purposes; they are strictly for prayer. Also, if I may know how that you are so sure that they are funded by the Saudi government, and how you are certain that they are terrorist cells. I suggest you visit a few of these institutions so that you can discover what a fool you were to have made that comment.

Regarding the construction of Churches in Muslim countries, I myself am from a Muslim nation, and I have seen many Churches there. Again, I ask where you have obtained evidence to support your claim that no Churches are allowed to be built in Muslim countries. Yet again, I suggest that, if you are that desperate to prove your claims, you visit these places and see if there are actually any Churches in those places.

Thus, after having commented on your ignorant and revolting comments, not to mention ignorant, I once again suggest that you go do some actual research into your claims, and reply only after you have some solid and valid proof to support your bogus claims.

Thank you.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".