|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flynt Analysis on the issue and disconnection in reality.Reader comment on item: Riyadh Reorients to Moscow Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Dec 2, 2007 at 02:45 1. First time I know about the intention of the US to deep relations to a country that in my understanding will consider all Bargain in action Uni-Lateral, no matter what package they agree in advance, having the Baksheesh culture in mind as a motto. 2. And, the US wants Iran cooperation for improvements in Iraq? How sick is that. 3.A dual cooperation in between the two would require America's acceptance of the Islamic Republic and recognition of a legitimate Iranian role in the region, but Iran is a terrorist state- is that the reason why Washington supported Israel humiliation in Annapolis? This type of sick relation as normal? 4. And. how schizophrenic as Gerald Posner several times stated, is the relation in between KSA and America? The KSA is rather praised and unconditionally protected by America, in the sense I'm aware of than showing animosity. 5. As Flynt says: "...changes in Iranian behavior and policies"... The problem is not the Iranian regime but the Iranian Motto which does not change. "..Assuming that U.S. concerns about Iranian pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and opposition to a negotiated settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict were addressed satisfactorily and that Tehran terminated its provision of military equipment and training to terrorist organizations, the United States would commit to ending unilateral sanctions against the Islamic Republic imposed by executive orders, reestablishing diplomatic relations and reaching a settlement of other bilateral claims"... Iran already stated their will of destroying Israel forever so this type of thing will never make Iran and the US have a bargaining relation.... read the following article- I liked it a lot. http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/Flynt%20Leverett%20testimonyNovember07.htm I loved Flynt's approach but I find it surrealistic given also that the timeframe for this improvement is much larger than what the US has now- so is KSA allying with Russia b/c they know Russia anymosity and resentments against America- as way of blackmailing America? The KSA is not friendly to Iran, unless when to destroy Israel and wants to pressure the US not to support Iran in any way? Deplorable. More money to the Russian Mafia..... Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (10) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |