With Respect to Madam Eva.

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Jan 5, 2008 at 20:11

1. It is interesting that you guys from the media, when see what YOU call a one sided affair, get angry so hypocritely. The Media today is dominated, and controlled, if not to say defined mostly as a result of being under financial blackmail by terrorists and Islamists.

2. Even if you were – convincingly- right in the first argument, a "one sided affair" which I doubt- I would not condemn for him being one sided when against the parasites from the left, liberals, islamists etc...

3. I see no problem if he starts a political party being him still the only one.

"Where there is no man, stand up and be the man"

4. Your "proven" fact about his support for Nazism, not only lacks of proof (proven to you NOT to us), but also lacks on a second level about the cited third party. I have several friends in Netherlands, and they would be consulted

4. You are a Media Watcher- Wow-EVERYBODY today is a Media Watcher, so it is not even a PHD specialty. To be honest, any moron watches the Media today and the Media- the last trustable source of anything. And, Indeed, the way you emotionally you express your opinion, shows yes a one sided affair from you, a personal agenda.

5. Really, he wants to prohibited half of the Koran...isn't that part that calls others pigs and monkeys, that wants to kill all infidels and establish their bestial Shariah all over the world, with only one religion on course- and where to mutilate female sexual "apparatus" is legal?

I see no problem. Only an islamo fascist- Nazis would be angry about that.

And, Islam wants the Torah, the bible and Buddhism to be totally erased from earth...

Why don't you in your "moderate" position do not criticize Islam. Is it a matter of a personal agenda from one of those losers from the left that want to feel themselves as valuable human beings as protecting the human rights of those who support their inability of surviving in the competitive market, at a cost of innocent human lives, yet guaranteeing their leftist's miserable slice of bread?

6. You said Elephantitis... I"m here to teach you about it:

Elephantiasis is a disease that is characterized by the thickening of the skin and underlying tissues, especially in the legs and genitals. ("Elephantitis" is a common mis-hearing or mis-remembering of the term, from confusing the ending -iasis -- process or resulting condition -- with the more commonly heard -itis -- irritation or inflammation.)

Please you should become a BETTER Dictionary Watcher

7. Wilders has not achieved what he wants yet...No problem....It is a matter of time.

Finally Eva says:

"Whoever dares to call a 10 minute amateur video on YouTube a "film" must be somewhat on the megalomaniac side, don't you agree?"

There is no definition technically speaking to how long a pellicle has to be in order to be called a film. The abstract noun you used to express this third one- as belonging to the "megalomaniac" environment carries bias against Wilder beyond stupidity, aggression and discrimination against others who denoted the existence of this pellicle as film. As if you were the Webster dictionary or Steven Spielberg himself. This is so deplorable that I barely can paint the "level of your argument" Not only was your commentary, technically speaking, poor beyond the pale, but also brought the X-ray of your intentions here.

You did neither convince me nor my kind, but reinforced our former light support (Now strong support), for Wilders.

Indeed as our beloved Sir Pipes so splendidly said:

"...That a lone individual, a Rushdie or a Wilders, is in the anomalous position of driving a state's policy makes this situation so fascinating and anomalous. "..

Now I'm more fascinated that ever, AND I disagree to you when you ask:

"...don't you agree?"...

Thanks a Lot, Madam Eva.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".