|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Definitely.Reader comment on item: Is the Solution to Hire More Muslim Journalists? Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Mar 6, 2008 at 16:31 I recall a poll made in 2002 (cannot find the URL), where Americans were asked, in their thoughts, in terms of integrity, honest and trust, in 49 exposed common professions, obviously represented by professionals they see/know, which professions were the most honorable and which ones the most deplorable. From the first place as the most honorable you could see doctors, nurses. Engineers..... Number 48 or almost the most deplorable: Lawyers. Number 49: Journalists along with Car Dealers. To be ignorant, to perpetuate ignorance or even to struggle to indoctrinate through ignorance or by imposing ones' ignorance, IT also constitutes dishonesty. Since Americans are fed up of journalists and since their biases and lethargy leads ones to think that the only thing that make them jerk is money, I suggest a law where all journalists are subject to make public all their sources of income. B/C the only thing that justifies such an immorality OR better saying A-morality is cash. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (48) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |