Who are you kidding ? Just like Wen Ho Lee

Submitted by Silicondoc (United States), Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29

The government has to drop the charges in many of these cases, since people like you scream for standard courtroom drama, and the classified information is too valuable for the government to continue, and allow who knows how many other non-close-mouthed individuals a look at the bounty.

If you actually take the time to read the story behind the story, you'll understand as much. The government got rid of them, and sometimes thats what it has to settle for nowadays, considering our less than stellar left wing coddle the enemies problem.

I mean what did you think when Jimmy Carter's former Attourney General went frollicking over to Bagdad to represent Saddam ? lol

I know, I know, terrorists have rights, too, and why isn't GWB behind bars or sitting in the refurbished just for a special occassion Texan electric chair....

I guess those rights we , the FBI, the Jamie Gorelick's of the Clinton Justice Department, gave terrorists like Zacharrias Moussaioui and his laptop were one too many "rights" weren't they ? I mean the Pheonix Memo should have made it CLEAR to you that our left wing psychotic fringe freak show has swung the pendulum a bit too far portside...

Let's face it, if the standardized procedure would have been take a look at that laptop, instead of " We know the judge will deny this request, they have a dozen times already in similar cases" - why THEN 911 MIGHT HAVE BEEN PREVENTED.

I thought we learned our lesson in the hearings and the massive media coverage and the intense going over about "what happened" - and "how we're we so vulnerable" - but I'm quite aware that a lot of that was lost in the rabid partisan attack dogging on GWB, blaming the POTUS for everything under the sun, with the drunken wonder Ted Kennedy quipping " What did he know and when did he know it !"

Look, I'm not for all of that partisan insane crap. We'll all die just the same as we did on 911, repub, demo, inde, whatever.

I'm for having a realistic assessment, and then following through with putting the hammer DOWN on the possibilities.

If you believe this idiot Imam at Gitmo was abused because he uncovered "abuse" - then you do need to by a bridge in the swamp. The REST of the psycho left human rights reporting has a big fat ZERO on Gitmo - in fact if the idiot left had a clue they'ed be asking why so many terrorists were let go... and actually make a huge dent in their opposition coming from that angle.

We have a problem. Modern liberalism has caused the easier, softer, kinder, gentler, crybaby methodology of justice to prevail - even when it comes to terrorists freaks picked up on the battlefield after they fired upon, wounded, injured and or killed our soldiers, our allies soldiers, and the local people's soliers and women and children !

It has gone TOO FAR. 5 bowing, praying, milling about Imam's from a foreign land can sue passengers who suspected them because of their strange behaviors ? Tell me that isn't insane. Worst part about it is, they probably are jihadists, for cripes sakes their bigshot Imams, and that's who preaches the crap !

I think the libbies have gone far too soft. Far, far too soft. Truman and even JFK would beat them over the head with a common sense stick. How can I possibly believe the democraptics are "the party of peace" - as they proclaim to be right now ? The party of chickens and liars for the moment, YES. That however will change as soon as they take enough of a beating. I see 911 wasn't that required beating.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".