69 million page views

Crazies and Danger

Reader comment on item: [Michael Barkun on] Old Conspiracies, New Beliefs

Submitted by Fay Voshell (United States), Jan 16, 2004 at 14:40

I think it was Thorstein Veblen who characterized America as one giant psychiatric ward, but I'm not sure. Anyway, if he wrote it, he had a point.

The history of the US does reveal it has hosted more than its fair share of troubled visionaries, each leader and each group with its unique version of apocalypse now. Even science, which is considered the most rational of all disciplines, has its own apocalyptic eschatology complete with THE END: deep freeze or heat death--whichever you prefer.

But the crazies and their predictions come and go like most fads, while the vast majority of citizens read such ideas with mild interest and probably a lot of amusement-- and then get back to living.

So I don't think there's much danger in an Illuminati/reptilian conspiracy taking over our country. On the contrary, I think the most dangerous ideas are most often those that seem the most emminently reasonable. The most dangerous ideas are those that claim quick fixes to the problems most people worry about most of the time: financial stability, a steady political order; safety of hearth and home, a secure future.

It will be the Huey Long populist types who pose the greatest threat to this country, not the overtly and obviously crazy.

Fay Voshell

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (25) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1Freemasonry, Zionists, and Social/Digital Media [582 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
RobertJan 14, 2022 20:38278256
SHORT CIRCUITS [16 words]MARK SIMPSONMay 24, 2008 20:03129837
1Mildly interesting, but not explanatory [315 words]morpheusFeb 5, 2004 13:3713766
Fusion Paranoia [145 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 4, 2004 20:3613751
about old Conspiracies, new beliefs [144 words]FabienneJan 20, 2004 20:5813446
The Politically Disaffected In America [26 words]Michael ZeldisJan 19, 2004 01:3413401
1Stereotyping Conspiracy Theorists [259 words]Guy w. KleinertJan 18, 2004 07:0913397
skeptic [40 words]stuart leeJan 18, 2004 01:1213395
Crazies and Danger [209 words]Fay VoshellJan 16, 2004 14:4013381
what do you believe? [17 words]jeremy morrisonJan 14, 2004 20:0313368
Conspiracies [155 words]R. Lynn KelleyJan 14, 2004 11:4813363
You left a group out, Mr. Pipes. [274 words]Tom BryantJan 14, 2004 10:2713362
Old Conspiracies, New Beliefs [129 words]Scott SimonsJan 14, 2004 06:1113358
my (non-conspiracy) theory [99 words]relapsedcatholicJan 13, 2004 19:2813344
conspiracy theories/assassins/etc. [138 words]Peter J. HerzJan 13, 2004 19:0413343
1Left-sided conspiracy theories [48 words]David C. StolinskyJan 13, 2004 18:5313342
Nail on the head! [138 words]Donovan HudsonJan 13, 2004 18:4313341
worry about Illuminati, etc. [300 words]FCJan 13, 2004 13:3813333
1MYTH AND CONSPIRACY [96 words]DONVANJan 13, 2004 12:2913331
Conspiracy Theories [164 words]Stephen BermanJan 13, 2004 12:2813330
Old Conspiracies, New Beliefs [112 words]Bob MilliganJan 13, 2004 12:0313327
Washington Post's article on Middle East studies [227 words]SteveJan 13, 2004 11:5113326
Conspiracies in our time [216 words]Paul M. WeyrichJan 13, 2004 11:4913325
1Remember what the U in UFO stands for [71 words]Charles R.L. PowerJan 13, 2004 11:3113324
3Conspiracy Facts vs. Conspiracy Theories [301 words]Jose M. PaulinoFeb 5, 2009 05:0413324

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)