69 million page views

Literal interpretations

Reader comment on item: Talking Freely about the Enemy
in response to reader comment: Why Geert Wilders is Right and Dr. Pipes Wrong on Islam

Submitted by Mycos (Canada), Mar 12, 2009 at 23:38

... I must say somethng about the position adopted by Wilders, Singha et al.

Why do they keep insisting that all Musims must be fundamentalist and must read the Quran literally? When the Torah and Christian Bible are read literally they are both capable of justifying grievous violations of human devency, indeed passages in the Book Of Numbers can be said to encourage forced slavery and pedophilia.

But the vast majority of Christians no longer read them that way, that is except for some crackpot denominations in the US and Israel who read these texts in a way that is at odds with the vast majority of others of their faith. And those denominations all denounce other Christians and Jews who don't read it that way as not being true Christians or Jews as well....exactly the way Wilders insists Musims must read their text or not be true Muslims.

Either Wilders is extremely racist in supposing that Muslims MUST interpret the Quran litterally because they don't have the intellect to do otherwise, or Wilders is himself lacking the intellect to undersatand that most Muslims DO NOT read it literally and yet are still considered good Muslims by the majority...which is all that really matters. Sure. The orthodox among them will insists that a literal interpretation is the only way it can be read and to do otherwise is apostasy, but like the majority of Jews or the majority of Christians who shake their head at the Rev. Phelps and the venomous snake-handlers, they all know that such an interpretation is incompatible with reality.

So why do they insist that only Muslims do not have the liberty of interpreting the Quran any way they want? Why does Wilders interperet it literally when most Muslims themselves do not? Why the double standard? Is it because they are Arab, Indian, or Asiatic for the most part? And saying that the Quran forbids reading it any other way, means that he accepts that only the Quran means what it says when it makes such a statement while giving the Holy Bible short shrift when it says things like "Only through me shall you find the Kingdom of God" or "I am the way, the truth, and the light". Not being familiar with Judiasm, I'm sure that somewhere in the Torah there is a passage that proclaims that only through studying Judaic texts can one find G-d, as well.

Indeed, it appears there's two kinds of Muslim extremists in the world. Those that read the Quran literally, and those who insist that everyone else must do so, even tho they themselves aren't even Muslim! I suggest it is not a coincidence that both kinds insist on literal interpretations.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (35) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Tribal religion [78 words]Muslimk***Feb 13, 2010 16:12168868
Islamic Brutality [327 words]MathewsJul 5, 2010 15:31168868
Geert and Dr. Pipes are Right [226 words]GWKFeb 5, 2010 04:34168491
odd isn't it [60 words]dennisJan 20, 2010 06:20167606
Re-interpretation of Sharia is good but it is not enoough [198 words]AbhiMay 9, 2009 14:38155158
You know the story of the cat... [115 words]yidlmitnfidlMar 12, 2009 16:23152175
Cassius Clay a terrorist? [61 words]MycosMar 12, 2009 23:52152175
31Why Geert Wilders is Right and Dr. Pipes Wrong on Islam [932 words]SinghaMar 10, 2009 23:47152069
Literal interpretations [453 words]MycosMar 12, 2009 23:38152069
Literal Islam? Non Sequitur [129 words]SinghaMar 16, 2009 10:52152069
Jesus Christ throughout history... [127 words]LynnMar 9, 2009 07:22151922
Son, father and Holy Spirit [28 words]Not importantFeb 26, 2020 06:33151922
Examples of re-interpretation of Islamic Sharia in modern times [277 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
SaniMar 8, 2009 18:55151884
It is dictatorship from above [158 words]G.VishvasMar 10, 2009 09:37151884
Interesting about Ayatollah Khomeini -- another reason to prefer the Shiites [123 words]Charles MartelMar 10, 2009 11:30151884
Chameleon [79 words]LynnMar 14, 2009 23:27151884
Daniel Pipes is in the right ! [222 words]Anne-Marie DelcambreMar 21, 2009 14:37151884
Further Vroad Question for Dr. Pipes [58 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
AlexMar 23, 2009 20:21151884
suprise surprise: allowed to suspend basic principles of Islamic theology [46 words]mythJan 21, 2010 13:49151884
the traditional islamic woman [37 words]mythJan 21, 2010 13:56151884
Examples of re-interpretation of Islamic Sharia in modern times-Response [200 words]ctwFeb 23, 2010 06:38151884
Truth or opinion? [243 words]Rebecca MouldsMar 7, 2009 15:18151824
US Muslim Congressman causes uproar : An eye opener for all those Americans who voted for this Jehadi [206 words]shurikDec 8, 2006 16:5968815
is there a Muslim in the House? [190 words]donvanDec 11, 2006 13:3368815
Educate Keith Ellison [1094 words]Bob ChristiansenJan 15, 2007 20:2168815
What Islam is [427 words]Mitzi AlvinDec 27, 2005 13:0130639
token.... [92 words]donvanDec 12, 2006 10:2130639
To Mitzi Alvin [123 words]RioMar 21, 2009 10:1030639
With literal meanings, religions can be ugly (unbeautiful) and bad. [143 words]AbhiMay 9, 2009 15:1730639
What Islam peaceful? [150 words]surJul 20, 2009 12:0030639
Dude [10 words]RioJul 22, 2009 01:3130639
1Sure people kill. [69 words]surJul 22, 2009 20:2130639
So not to point fingers [122 words]RioJul 24, 2009 01:3530639
Its time to point the finger. [174 words]surAug 30, 2009 17:1030639
1finger still pointing at Islam. [176 words]surAug 30, 2009 17:5430639

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)