69 million page views

Response to "the Historian"

Reader comment on item: Washington Puzzles over the Mujahedeen-e Khalq
in response to reader comment: response to "The Historian"

Submitted by RST (China), Aug 9, 2009 at 00:06

The Comment by the so call "THe Historian" is full of the old stigma of "we did it", let's make it clear for once and for all, the overthrow of Mossadegha or of Allende in Chile, for that matter, could not be done without locals support. By saying "we" you are implying there was a CIA agent in every corner with a machine gun and that is not true and it missleading.

For years I had to listen to the "academia" throwing around their usual "west is guilty of everything" when the facts are coups and revolutions are done because there is enough local support to get rid of the government. By saying what you are saying you are only re-enforcing the "conspiracy" mind of the Middle East and for that matter the rest of the world. Take Allende for example he was heading for a finacial melt down so he was overthrown by Chileans sick and tired of their so call socialist heaven!!, Did the CIA did it? NO, did the CIA helped the coup with finacial support? YES, Could it be done without Chileans participating in it? NO.

It is time we start seeing things for what they are, countries are responsible for they own rises and falls, even if the CIA wanted to change anything they don' t the manpower or might and it is not possible to change an ounce without a significant local support.

Every time a so call "historian" claims "we did or we didn't" I cringe because what it means is a lack of understanding of how people behave or conduct themselves.

Every time I hear a "historian" making the sort of claims made here it reminds me of my times in the Dominican Republic where everything was either the fault of the Americans or the Spaniards!!

Cheers!

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
correct me if I'm wrong... [337 words]Peter HerzNov 29, 2011 22:13191314
more on MEK [101 words]Peter HerzDec 1, 2011 05:55191314
revised thinking [147 words]russell wohlfordMar 7, 2013 11:19191314
linkage [8 words]Consul-At-ArmsJun 24, 2011 12:19186743
Arabs need a secular dictator [90 words]MotkeJun 17, 2010 01:11174480
Now, should Israel trust Clinton's umbrella [60 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDAug 12, 2009 11:05160103
Regarding Mujahideen-e Khalq [74 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Debanjan BanerjeeMay 11, 2009 20:51155254
The MeK is a secular alternative -- they deserve our benign support at least [143 words]Charles MartelAug 13, 2009 11:20155254
Remember Mossadeq [121 words]Charles MartelAug 16, 2009 05:34155254
As for Mossadegh... [117 words]Kepha HorNov 29, 2011 21:53155254
Seems to me that Mr. Kepha needs to study history more [369 words]Debanjan BanerjeeDec 4, 2011 11:26155254
Dear Debanjan [227 words]Kepha HorDec 9, 2011 16:49155254
Dear Kepha [743 words]Debanjan BanerjeeDec 10, 2011 12:27155254
2I met these folks [518 words]russell wohlfordAug 24, 2006 11:2053901
Read some history [436 words]The Historian...Nov 19, 2006 12:4953901
response to "The Historian" [1093 words]russell wohlfordNov 22, 2006 02:4053901
Response to "the Historian" [305 words]RSTAug 9, 2009 00:0653901

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)