Freedom of Speech and the Muslim mind

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 22, 2009 at 07:26

Our dear so called Nabil al-tablighee wrote

>... Dhimmi...do you remember when some idiot "Muslims" in New York cheered when the World Trade Center towers came down on 9-11?

Yes I do and it made it to CBS's 60 minutes

>Do you remember what happened to them? They had done nothing wrong but "express their opinions".

And you know what? we did not execute or deport any of them even that stupid muhajjaba the young woman that appeared in the inteview and we did not deport or execute the Neo-Nazis in Skokie either

>And yet...well, since you're soooo smart and sooo knowledgable with regard to the US Constitution and democracy, shouldn't you have defended them against what happened to them afterwards?

So what happened to them afterwards? were they deported or executed as you suggest?

> Did you file a lawsuit on their behalf? After all, their "civil rights" were "violated".

What civil rights were violated as in the case of the stupid muhajjaba that appeared in the CBS segment? and you know what? I will be the first one to defend her rights to spew her islamic venom but I will expose her for what she really is and let the market place of ideas be the judge

>So...before you attack me again with your ...nonsensical arguments with regard to "standing up for American Democracy", I want to see you come out openly and clearly in favor of those idiots.

Again you do not get it . WE DO NOT DEPORT OR EXECUTE PEOPLE THAT WE HAPPEN TO DISAGREE WITH

But again you learn from your so called prophet that if someone disagrees with him as in the case of Asma the poet and who believed that he was not anymore than an Arabian warlord and caravan raider and he ordered that she be killed and indeed she was killed by one of his thugs while suckling her baby! Shame on him and shame on you for wanting to harm people that you happen to disagree with and this is why Islam is a fascist

> Otherwise you'll be proving to everyone here once and for all that you are nothing but a coward, a blowhard and a hypocrite who prefers to go after those who defend this country simply because they are Muslims.

Mixing apples and oranges again I see. I go after your likes that want to execute and deport people that they happen to disagree with and because I have respect for the Constitution not because I have any respect for islam or for the likes of Hizb al-Tahrir

>And those "Muslims" who work against this country are defended by you.

Yes I defend freedom of speech of anyone (even if I do not like them) in this country including your likes even realizing that there are limits for freedom of speech

>And let us not forget what was done about Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor was bombed. Was that "constitutional", Dhimmi?

That was a horrible mistake. You? your Hindu ancestors were subjected to a genocide by your masters the Muslims (the likes of mahmud of ghazni) that invaded India so you are the last one to lecture anyone about atrocities

>as for the idiot up in Alberta, he was a tablighee and an ignoramus like you. I'm not, nor have ever been one, nor ever intend to be.

Oh Our dear Syed Soharwardy: What a piece of work

>You're not siding with any constitution. You're the real Mr. Fake here. One BEEEEG fake.

No the fake is you

I urge you once again to embrace Islam and be free.

But I told you that Allah made me an infidel and this means that I cannot be Muslim unless you want me to go against your Allah's will. So do you want me to go against your Allah's will? as for you: you are not supposed to be Muslim as per Q14:4 right our dear so called nabil.

I'm thinking about a religion for you: well i can rule out Buddhism as it is too sophisticated for the Muslim mind oh and stay tuned

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".