Motive irrelevant

Submitted by Nick. N. (United States), Nov 10, 2009 at 14:45

A religion based on tenets of superiority over non-Muslims and a religious duty to expand and convert anyone they can, does not need a "motive." A motive is personal and purely individual in nature. Koranic doctrines are general, and allow no room for individual thought. Even considering converting or leaving Islam is punishable by death.

Has anyone heard any Muslim -- peaceable, moderate, or radical -- ever condemn or criticize Palestinians for training their youngest children, 7-13, at summer camps, for no other purpose in life but to kill? Children are taught the philosophy of martyrdom and how to achieve it. Parents proudly hold up their babies wearing mock suicide belts at rallies. Mothers have gladly accepted $25,000 rewards from Saddam Hussein for sacrificing their children for the cause of martydom.

Nor is it necessary to be a Jew living in Israel, formerly an arid and empty wasteland unlivable except by a few hardy Beduins. Simply look at any Christian enclave or minority area within any Muslim country and you'll see the same behavior. Infidels are infidels, and location does not matter. From Africa to Asia, Sudan, China, India, Indonesia, etc. have the same fears. Even France, where Muslims only make up around 10% of the population, already has it's own "no-go zones" where police and fire departments won't travel. Any country in Europe can break out in riots from a cartoon or 10 minute documentary.

Western concepts of individual motive is not a requirement.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".