Will the EU, by feeeling much less appreciated by Obama, open even more doors to Islamism?

Submitted by Svet (United States), Nov 18, 2009 at 02:18

Regardless we have Obama or not, one thing is fact: Never, ever, for the most that America tries to do the best, it will be ever close enough to what foreigners (to America) expect. The arrogance is not an American arrogance but a whole world wide westerner arrogance and immaturity. Yet, I'm happy that the EU has been very disappointed on Obama, even angry- that makes me very happy, for what Obama is the worse of America: Leftists, parasites, opportunists and swindlers.

But, what concerns me the most is the increase of Islamism, as backlash...Will the EU, in years of distress, either by really being ignored or not being able to deal with its own arrogance, be able to counter Islamism or use it as a tool to attack America?

Correct me, if I'm being somehow out of the spectrum. Let me draw a parallel.

IN South America there is a huge anti Americanism. For example: Brazil, despite of billions of dollars of American help, disgracefully throw up on America, by screaming Imperialists and oppressors and throwing on America its problems, which happens to be an astronomical lie. Brazilians problems rely on their corrupted governors. Ahmadinejad is visiting Brazil this month, and many applaud that as a way to be aggressive against America, in a nutshell. Obviously, the matter increase in exports from Brazil to Iran is a major play in this astronomical Chutzpah, but, at the end of the day, since Iranians will not even need a visa to access that continental country, gladly encountering with the Hitler of South America- Chavez, no doubt the whole context will open doors to an increase of Islamism in South America, fortifying Islamism politically and economically against America and the world- by proxy. South America support to Iran is way to be against America- in my opinion, an expression of profound disrespect, disdain and hatred.

So will the EU become a stronger ally to Islamists?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".