That's nice but a little short on "how" and "what"

Submitted by Paul Freedman (United States), May 1, 2010 at 15:15

Well, the why of "victory" is clear but we are a little short here on the what steps need to be done concretely to accomplish this and how to achieve them. If reoccupation is intended it should be clearly put on the table--if something else not being done now, what?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".