69 million page views

Passive Jihad

Reader comment on item: American Muslims in the Liquor Business
in response to reader comment: Nothing out of ordinary

Submitted by Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthi (India), Sep 15, 2010 at 08:46

One Muslim should not be punished for deeds of another, rather beliefs of the other.
One Muslim can not be forced to consume liquor, because some other Muslims consumes it. No Muslim can be stopped from liquor business because some other Muslim hates alcohol.
If both of them use democracy for their own reason or profit it is their smartness and right and not failure of Democracy, may it is exploitation of democracy in remote sense.
you can't hold responsible one act or individual for another. This reason is not fair.

However, Muslim Taxi Driver can not refuse to carry any Muslim or non- Muslim for reason he has a bottle of liquor in his baggage, as he is not forced to drink it. Teller can not refuse to make bill for a list of items just because if has wine in that list. Unfortunately, that is happening, drivers have refused to carry passengers. Even if there are not many cases, but every single such incident is setback to democracy, will and act to impose, subjugation and passive Jihad.

Additionally, this will tear the democracy texture, Sikh may refuse passenger carrying cigar, Hindu Beef, Jew pork.
But why should property of Government be burnt in Kashmir because some one in US has (not) burned the Koran. Why should twin tower be attacked because some one is trying catch Laden in Af-Pak.

Why should Christians be prosecuted, victim child of Rape be stoned to death, those who say humans are unfair to Jihadis have to explain this.
www.jhatka.org explains about Halal Jihad.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment

Reader comments (7) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2muslims were demanding that they not have to handle liquor, because it violated the koran and therefore their rights, ..but when it helps them . . .anything goes. [230 words]Phil GreendJul 30, 2010 00:02176157
Sell [188 words]AlbertEJul 25, 2010 15:04176017
Muslims violating the good parts of Quran is never the issue [231 words]TedJul 22, 2010 23:11175914
1Nothing out of ordinary [79 words]VijayJul 21, 2010 12:14175863
Passive Jihad [261 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiSep 15, 2010 08:46175863
1alcholic jihad? [71 words]California Dream'inJul 18, 2010 10:29175734
1Not a Unique Experience [100 words]Jew from NewarkJul 18, 2010 03:30175723

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)