69 million page views

Racial profiling is ok, but has to be matched with a reasonably swift dispension of justice.

Reader comment on item: To Profile or Not to Profile? [The Abdullah al-Kidd Case]

Submitted by rk683 (United States), Oct 18, 2010 at 13:17

I am a brown south-asian, non-muslim man. And I have experience with heightened attention by airport security directed at me. I find it irksome, & time consuming but not exceedingly so. And I think that it just makes sense to direct your attention & resources to those areas where it is most required.

however what is disturbing about the Abdullah-al Kidd story, is how racial profiling was followed by blatant misuse of the legal system by law enforcement authorities. It is evident that the law enforcement acted badly. They failed to ask if he would appear as a witness voluntarily. They lied to a judge about the nature of his travel, hid the facts about his citizenship & purpose of travel. And then held him for 16 days, treating him like a suspect. I fail to understand what could have caused the epsiode where he was held naked and shackled.

Mr Kidd has the right to sue, and he should be able to sue the department of homeland security, out of large sums of money and the agent, wardens of the facilities he was held at out of a job. Racial profiling shouldn't be used to deem someone guilty without trial and then treat them as such. Which is what has happened in his case.

It is perfectly acceptable to question someone because of their association, but it is not an excuse to suspend the rule of law.

I would hope that Mr Kidd and his lawyers pursue his case on the basis of the actual wrongdoings of the case and not on what the motive could have been. Afterall, he was wronged & he has the right to get justice, just like anyone else.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment

Reader comments (48) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Racial profiling is ok, but has to be matched with a reasonably swift dispension of justice. [285 words]rk683Oct 18, 2010 13:17179388
I wish it would stop/The chickens will come home to roost. [262 words]Wali A. RazzaqDec 14, 2006 21:5469576
racism? [66 words]Rick DonaldsonAug 24, 2006 12:1553904
Racial Profiling is Racism in action. EOM [6 words]Bryan AlawiDec 19, 2005 08:0430179
Because it's Them not You [275 words]TimDec 15, 2004 14:0419012
Read one's history [92 words]SubrataOct 4, 2004 11:3517515
Is Racial Profiling Enough? [82 words]Ian G.Oct 3, 2004 23:0817511
Yes to profiling. [266 words]RPSep 28, 2004 02:1517419
what about America's homegrown terrorists? [97 words]BGApr 18, 2009 12:1917419
Righteous Indignation [51 words]Ron MSep 28, 2004 01:1417418
Dont go too far [214 words]johnSep 26, 2004 17:3817323
Profiling is a constitutional defense of freedom [40 words]Alvin SamuelsSep 26, 2004 03:4017247
Profiling is bad? [129 words]Adam LubinSep 23, 2004 21:1617157
Wake up. Protect ourselves. [31 words]Preston PhillipsSep 23, 2004 02:1517115
Mind Readers? I think not [62 words]David LincolnSep 22, 2004 23:1317111
Racial Profiling [67 words]Jeff MartinSep 22, 2004 22:3117110
Necessity of Profiling [6 words]Norris HaseltonSep 22, 2004 19:0417106
We're stupid if we DON'T profile [1179 words]lukeSep 22, 2004 17:0217103
Spot On [88 words]LouFeb 11, 2009 19:0217103
Terrorists among us [87 words]Kim SegarSep 22, 2004 13:0417101
Err on the side of safety [90 words]James Van ValkenburgSep 22, 2004 09:2517098
Politically incorrect [24 words]Alvin ShamesSep 22, 2004 09:2117097
Phony human rights [91 words]S.C.PandaSep 22, 2004 05:4917093
Profiling [214 words]Michael BurkertSep 22, 2004 02:2617089
Amnesty International [45 words]Jaleh AzadSep 22, 2004 01:1417088
More profiling please [22 words]Tom PensylSep 22, 2004 00:4617087
How right you are [34 words]Ivan MicklinSep 22, 2004 00:2817085
Counter Terrorism and Profiling [231 words]Harold DodsonSep 21, 2004 23:1417083
Absolutely spot-on [32 words]Jeff MagnusonSep 21, 2004 23:1317082
tough choice [212 words]John W McGinleySep 21, 2004 22:5617081
Tough problems call for tough answers [22 words]WalterSep 21, 2004 22:1817080
Life Precedes Rights [88 words]T. B. RobertsSep 21, 2004 21:4417078
To Profile or Not to Profile [195 words]Arlinda DeAngelisSep 21, 2004 20:4117076
The Truth about AI [326 words]Peter J. HerzSep 21, 2004 20:1017074
Approval of your arguments. [280 words]Jim WrightSep 21, 2004 17:0517072
Which has priority in war--civil rights or citizens' safety? [60 words]Anne WhiteSep 21, 2004 14:5017067
Profiling an absolute necessity [95 words]C. CannonSep 21, 2004 13:2617066
Profiling [110 words]Susan KriegerSep 21, 2004 12:5217063
Outrage about profiling! [87 words]Shirley PylantSep 21, 2004 12:2517061
When Profiling is Justified [105 words]Robert SmithSep 21, 2004 12:1017058
I agree! [29 words]NinaSep 21, 2004 11:4717055
Shame on Amnesty International & USA [100 words]JALEH AZADSep 21, 2004 11:3017053
A balance [156 words]John H. RubelSep 21, 2004 11:0917051
Profiling Muslims [60 words]Alan SkorskiSep 21, 2004 10:5117048
Muslim Profiling [79 words]PARAug 16, 2006 20:3517048
Profiling is correct [174 words]Rabindra BhattacharjeeAug 25, 2006 01:5517048
Profiling muslims should be a law, not a debate [51 words]paulJun 21, 2007 00:1517048
change shoes [43 words]abby n.Dec 5, 2007 22:5417048

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)