69 million page views

I hope I'm wrong, but...

Reader comment on item: CrossTalk on Middle East: Shifting sands
in response to reader comment: The Shifting sands

Submitted by Peter Herz (United States), Jan 26, 2011 at 18:57

Frankly, I think a culture needs to have read the Bible (Old and New Testaments) for a while or to have lived in the shadow of a culture that did in order to make limited, consensual government work. For two centuries before the USA became independent, their European forefathers in Calvinist Europe were talking about limiting the power of kings, talking up the political supremacy of law, and even experimenting with a degree of democracy in Presbyterian and Congregationalist church polity. Even Calvin himself said that the ideal government would be a mix of aristocracy and democracy, since "Kings cannot be trusted to do what is right". We in the North Atlantic world are the exceptions. Most political history is despotism in one form or another.

Hence, the ferment in the Islamic world is just another of several such waves in modern times, all of which ended with some kind of new despotism. Islam denies original sin (and belief in original sin is one reason why a host of Northwest European Calvinists said, with Samuel Rutherford, that absolute power is a burden too great for mortal shoulders) and believes in the possibility of a "rightly guided Caliph" (never mind that the first four were all assassinated and their followers quick to tumble into civil war ). This disbelief in original sin is probably one reason why Islam is so prone to conspiracy-theorizing, and blaming everyone but themselves. Hence, I doubt that a seriously Islamic polity could work out a system of checks and balances, separation of powers, constitutional procedure, or nurture leaders who would simply step down and head back to the farm or business once terms were up.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (15) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
RT.COM [16 words]Bernie in MassachusettsJan 28, 2011 04:55182089
too much $ [77 words]lewis cookNov 27, 2012 22:25182089
charity starts at home [31 words]lewis cookDec 3, 2012 23:32182089
Religion & Revolution [38 words]Clifford IshiiJan 27, 2011 00:40182068
shifting subject [94 words]mythJan 24, 2011 11:14182007
It started with a fruit vendor [86 words]John in Michigan, USAJan 24, 2011 06:10181996
It didn't "start with" [40 words]Ian KnowltonJan 29, 2011 11:35181996
I think we actually agree [129 words]John in Michigan, USAJan 30, 2011 07:58181996
2Shifting Sands [66 words]Bishop Gabrielle Crofts AOCCJan 24, 2011 01:16181993
2have no fear [154 words]the Grand Infidel of KaffiristanJan 25, 2011 20:48181993
Shifting Sands [20 words]Brenda FranksJan 23, 2011 21:49181986
1The Shifting sands [276 words]SamJan 23, 2011 17:19181977
I hope I'm wrong, but... [279 words]Peter HerzJan 26, 2011 18:57181977
Like wrestling with jello [119 words]RalphSchmalphJan 23, 2011 16:23181973
islamism will win [50 words]y Brandstetter MDJan 23, 2011 01:00181952

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)