WORLD WAR 1V - The Battle of Holland.

Submitted by Mel Garden (Canada), Nov 17, 2004 at 12:22

Sir,

Your article on 'civil war' is the closest any 'journalist' has come to revealing the reality and hence opening the eyes of the naive, the apathetic and the useful idiots.

I do not use this rhetoric lightly - ... Scam would best describe what is going on in Holland, not the racial turmoil, but the revelation that we 'may be in a war'? Unfortunately, reporting Holland as "like a civil war" continues to soothe those that firmly have their heads buried deeply in the false god of multiculturism, instead of the melting pot.

...WWIV, 'The international Civil and Religious War' , is escalating - Thailand and China are now deeply into their own battles, as is our neighbour, America - violence is not far off.

No nation or civilization can survive if it cannot identify the threat - that threat is 'liberalism' which has removed the natural inclinations of mankind to 'limit' himself from the indulgences of 'self' and the resulting nihilism. Identifying the threat and the cause is the first step, the next step is to declare that multiculturism is not salvation, but the tool used to divide and conquer rather than merge our similarities into a peaceful world.

Governments that nurture this duplicitous scam may be naive, but their innocence does not square with their profession - this turmoil is induced with an agenda. I have an idea what the agenda is, but when battles rage around the planet, in every country, then does it matter - WAR is WAR. That it is not declared is clear evidence that something is afoot and our Governments are possibly seditious in that they are formenting strife and doing nothing to prevent it...

Thank you
Mel Garden/Royston BC

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".