Jihad by Stealth

Submitted by Wallace Edward Brand (United States), Oct 8, 2011 at 15:23

The Islamists have progressed beyond jihad by violence and terror. They now also use jihad by migration and jihad by stealth according to Bernard Lewis, the doyen or Middle East historians, and Robert Spencer who runs the blog "Jihad Watch". For a comprehensive treatment of this see The Team 2B Report on Shariah that you can find on the internet, Look particularly at the evidence submitted to the court in the Holy Land Foundation case in which a document obtained by the FBI pursuant to a search warrant of a terrorism suspect showed the goal of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America and listed the many mainstream Muslim organizations that were cooperating to obtain that goal.

The document that was entered into evidence was entitled: "An Eplanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group. It was written in 1991 by Mohamed Akram, a seniior Hamas leader in the US and a member of the Board of Directors for the Muslim Brotherhood in North America (also known as the "ikwhan") It explains that the "Movement" is a "settlement process' to establsih itself inside the US and, once established, to undertake a "grand jihad" charaterized in the memo as a "civilizaition jihadist" mission that is likewise led by the Muslim Brotherhood. Specifically the memo states "the'settlement process" [is] a 'grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated ...." According to the Muslim Brotherhood this stealthy process is called "Settlement Process".

In Europe, the takeover of Shariah is progressing apace by migration to tipping points when the population of Muslims gets first to 10% and then to over 50%.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".