Killing NO. Settlement and annexation? a different view

Submitted by Ash (Israel), Oct 23, 2011 at 08:31

Killing captives is NOT Jewish! It is OTHERS's way. But for the sake of arguement, let's consider another alternative:

What if, when a person (soldier or resident) is abducted, Israel, annexes by law say a 1 kilometer square of the land occupied by the enemy, and name it after the name of the hostage?

Then expand the annexation every year. When the captive is released negotiate about the ownership over that part of land during the peace accords, if any!

If they really want the land, then they should stop immediately, shouldn't they?

All Palestine is (according to documents as old as 3,400 years until even 1922) Jewish land anyway!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".