Our dear Amin Riaz is quoting a corrupted book to prove a point

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 21, 2012 at 07:41

Our dear Amin Riaz who ran away is trying really hard to tell us why does he quote a corrupted book and use it to support his bogus points of view

I wrote

"1. This ,means that you believe that the Bible is not corrupted because how could you quote a corrupted book as a reference after all garbage in is garbage out right "

And this was his answer

Just like you quote the Quran . I see you believe in it too. Try to think a bit . before attempting to type.

Hello: big difference the Qur'an is a book of literature and i examine the Qur'an as a book written by authors unknown at a point in time in a unique cultural milieu and it is a real text that should be approached as such

Muslims? they tells us the following

1. Allah says that he is the author of the Bible right?

2. Allah says that no one can alter his words right?

3. Then how come those bad Christians and them Jews were able to alter the words of Allah? you tell us unless there ain't no Allah right? or even worse he is not omnipotent so which one is it? you tell us

4. Then even Allah quotes the corrupted Bible as evidence as in saying that we will find the name of his so called rasul in the Bible! So your Allah is saying that the Bible is not corrupted otherwise he would not have used it as reference right?

5. Then Muslims have the audacity to quote a book that is supposed to be corrupted which means that any conclusions that you can draw about what the Bible says is not correct because this is a corrupted book right O glorious madrassa graduate right?

There is no half pregnant here it is either a corrupted book and in thin case do not use it as a reference or it is for real so which one is it? And you know what the answer is? It is a text at a point in time written by human beings for other human beings and so is the Hindu or Buddhist holy books and so is the Qur'an

If you do not get this much then you are really beyond help

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".