69 million page views

Private opinions and general convictions.. Or sentences?

Reader comment on item: The Orthodox Future of Judaism

Submitted by Oscar Laurens Schrover (Netherlands), Jan 27, 2005 at 06:01

Within each and every religious community that are debates about the ways to determine the membership of that community. As many other worldreligions Judaism is not a monolithic culture, there are many different sects, and denominations of which the orthodox is the fastest growing.

Now, people may differ on who is in and who is out, nevertheless I do not think that the argument of commenter Mr. Ephraim Feyertag improves mutual understanding when he blatantly writes: 'Spinoza's books are heretical. He didn't just write another point of view nor did he point a new way to be a Jew. He was another egomanical philospher that attempted to catagorize G-d's commandments (mitzvot) to the stinking realm of relativism.'

To condemn a man as heretical is always an argument that, for any scientist and cilivized man is a stigma that may have dire consequences for the condemned.. You may disagree with a book, but condemn and slur a person for it is to say the least using the argument ad hominem.

Though one can understand the passion with which a man and a woman defend their metaphysical outlook, I think we should – and that goes for all sensitive topics - try to maintain a civilized tone amongst eachother. And certainly when the western world is faced with the serious threat of Islamo-facism. The fervour of Mr. Feyertag is an anger which belies at least an inkling of intolerance. He is welcome to his ways and views, however if we want to be different from those that repeat Zarathustra's call – 'let us make them evil and improve upon their ways,' – we at least must try to safeguard some element of reason and not to follow our enemies in their ways..

Spinoza, and I do not know if Mr. Feyertag has read him—this author was my first incursion into the domaine of philosophy many years ago, and I do not regret it, is not only a rational man, but was also a modest and humble person who was, and many regret that nowadays, banned from the synagogue in Amsterdam. And only because he followed his own reasonings and the dictates of his conscience. Just as Marx did who wrote Dat Kapital, and makes commenter Carl Miller write: 'May I add that one of the most destructive elements amongst Jews, both in Europe and the US, has been their broad embrace of far-left and Marxist politics, even Stalinism, if one can believe it.'

Mr.Miller is certainly not a student of history for then he would know that that this was the main-argument of fascists during the worldwar when they went recruiting ss-soldiers in European countries. I shiver and find these remarks of a grizzlying nature, attempts to vent an ideology of anger where compassion is needed and constructive measures. All is lost when man thinks it is lost..

One may excuse these writers for their ignorance but their arguments are basically fallacies because they degrade the individuals who followed Marx and read Spinoza to pawns and puppets in a cynical puppetry, toys in the hands of a discontent and evil master. That is however not history and certainly a travesty of freedom and responsibility.

We must think for ourselves, and need not mime the thoughts in the books we read.

Man is often the reluctant master and servant of his own troublesome fate, an existance which he shapes within a framework of choices, thoughts and impressions. And I believe he bears some responsibility for the outcome of his fate. So I do not think there is any reason for writing a diatribe. To scold a man's philosophy is to deny the essence of freedom and of civil liberties which makes modernity as we know it.

Some people may not like this, but that is the state of our world, and anyone seeking to improve this condition with rules and stipulations and banning orders is certainly not going to make this a better world to live in.

I still remember one orthodox youngster who through reading Martin Buber joined the Hassidim (NY) and was extremely upset when his rabbi vilified Buber.. Man always seeks to improve on what we personally consider as too unseemingly ways—and that is our mistake. Let us grant some space to the Unmentionable.

And let Mr.Feyertag and Mr. Miller study the ways of the islamists in Europe and the USA, and acknowledge that they are promoting strife and inciting.. well, germinating hate, and let them not add to this ocean of discontent.

But to return to my point, those that somehow have become part of American Judaism, through their parents, even if they are from mixed marriages, (and this is a scientifically valid point of view) are partakers of what is called exosomatic heridity. I mean an established cultural heridity (through memes). Now, why not take them up on that and broaden the coalition that is willing to continue ideas and traditions, and support Israel? The world will not be a worse place for that.

People may follow the dictates of their private conscience. And everyone must seek his own personal initiation into Religious reality. Some man as Spinoza, Mr. Feyertag you must accept this without anger, will simply not stay put at 'But you've been told..' Why? Because man is a learning species, and some may learn this and others may learn that—so let us skip a final verdict on that. For now at least, because man, at large, does not posses the wisdom of Heavens. One conclusion we may draw from this debate: nothing is wrong with religion, but we may improve upon our manners and advocate tolerance in a time where dangerous forces seek destruction of others because Allah has decreed to them, Allah commanded them to kill westerners, Americans and above all Jews. That must at least count for something—not?
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (56) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1anat [86 words]kamenkaFeb 18, 2013 10:59203610
History shows... [363 words]JApr 4, 2005 12:0421327
History anyone? [224 words]Adrienne ScholzMar 8, 2005 10:4420869
Bothered [251 words]SimonaFeb 25, 2005 13:2820526
Religious movements [128 words]donvanFeb 23, 2005 14:2120492
SAUDI VENOM IN U.S. MOSQUES [243 words]LESFeb 3, 2005 16:5420094
Orthodox political action [319 words]Steve KleinFeb 2, 2005 08:1220068
A ll in the family [432 words]Jon B. RosenbergFeb 1, 2005 09:2020028
Why I became orthodox [530 words]S.Jan 31, 2005 16:3420016
Jews-Christians [104 words]Philip LindyJan 30, 2005 17:5419999
Who is Jewish? [82 words]Philip CrownJan 30, 2005 15:5119995
Reformed Orthodoxy? [201 words]AlexJan 28, 2005 18:5319953
Did the orthodox really dip to 5%? [49 words]Peter J. HerzJan 28, 2005 12:2719940
Reaction to the "Future of Judaism" [112 words]Rabbi Howard FinkelsteinJan 27, 2005 23:0219920
Reply to John W. McGinley [124 words]RWJan 27, 2005 22:3819918
From a Gentile [167 words]Arlinda DeAngelisJan 27, 2005 21:3319917
The spread of Islam was not always violent [125 words]Ron Lukens-Bull, Ph.DJan 27, 2005 20:3919915
It Was Not Always By Violence That The Christian Faith Spread [73 words]AnneMApr 24, 2006 17:4119915
Liberals vs Orthodox Jews [72 words]Octavio JohansonJan 27, 2005 17:0219914
confusion [433 words]jon KingAug 12, 2007 08:5419914
Maybe it is a bit silly, but [72 words]Alain Jean-MairetJan 27, 2005 14:1719911
Watch Out for "The Truth" [165 words]Timothy B. RobertsJan 27, 2005 10:4419908
MOMA [31 words]Raphael RothsteinJan 27, 2005 10:3919907
Private opinions and general convictions.. Or sentences? [964 words]Oscar Laurens SchroverJan 27, 2005 06:0119905
MUCH BETTER TO HAVE RELIGIOUS JEWS IN LIMELIGHT [57 words]Catherine FitzJan 27, 2005 04:5819904
The future of Judaism [259 words]Yossi Ben-AharonJan 27, 2005 04:3219903
Remember, at one time even the Orthodox were "Reformed" [36 words]Jeffrey LevineJan 27, 2005 01:0019901
Hasidism developed at same time as Reform in opposite direction. [430 words]Stuart TeichJan 26, 2005 23:1119900
No, it does not seem like Islamism at all ! [59 words]Dr Ahmed Youssif. MDJan 26, 2005 23:0019899
Embrace of Marx has been destructive [138 words]Cal MillerJan 26, 2005 19:4419897
WHO IS LIGHTING CANDLES FRIDAY NITE? [565 words]Carol HermanJan 26, 2005 17:5819895
You should read this Article by Rabbi Manis Friedman [47 words]Ephraim FeyertagJan 26, 2005 16:3619893
Orthodox Were Once Political [36 words]Nikki Roth-SkilesJan 26, 2005 15:3819892
Even the Orthodox have their problems! [354 words]Kenneth S. BesigJan 26, 2005 14:4419890
So many opinions! But the article is about problems Jews face. [441 words]Michael A. ShoemakerJan 26, 2008 03:1319890
If not a good man, what then? [535 words]Oscar Laurens SchroverJan 26, 2005 12:5719888
There are vibrant non-Orthodox Judaism alternatives out there [474 words]Stephen AsbelJan 26, 2005 12:4719887
Lisa Malik - the reason why conservative Judaism is gone [87 words]Disgusted DavenerMay 20, 2011 21:5619887
Anti-Semitism [84 words]George TanakisJan 26, 2005 12:2519886
The future of our nation [345 words]Y.EliashivJan 26, 2005 11:4919885
What do we do with the non-Orthodox? [165 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sheldon SeltzerJan 26, 2005 11:3419884
Orthodox Jews are the key to Judaism's survival [185 words]Octavio JohansonJan 26, 2005 06:2119882
A great religion of the world [81 words]S.C.PandaJan 26, 2005 05:0219881
Jewish "movements" [95 words]AriJan 26, 2005 01:5219876
Three to one [235 words]Duane GainsburgJan 25, 2005 23:2919875
A response to Orthodox trend toward hegemony and social action [299 words]Rabbi Edgar WeinsbergJan 25, 2005 22:1819872
Careful, Daniel [263 words]John W. McGinleyJan 25, 2005 21:4219870
Common Misconception [151 words]ElliotJan 25, 2005 17:0519866
Orthodoxy on rise...no surprise [576 words]Devorah AngelJan 25, 2005 17:0419865
Thoughts [153 words]BillJan 25, 2005 14:2919862
Does Judaism have any future at all? [450 words]Nora TehillosJan 25, 2005 14:1819860
Faith in non-orthodox circles [231 words]Ben SiscovickJan 25, 2005 13:4619856
It seems like Islamism [56 words]Neila Charchour HachichaJan 25, 2005 13:4219855
The National Jewish Population Survey 2000 [168 words]Tom TimmonsJan 25, 2005 11:4919854
jewish community in usa won't come [47 words]naorFeb 1, 2006 11:2119854
Future of Judaism [179 words]Jean McNealJan 25, 2005 11:4219852

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)