When wasn't Mahometanism a real threat to non-Mahometans? (2 missing paragraphs added)

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Nov 4, 2012 at 03:03

In my previous post two paragraphs were somehow lost.The passage read as follows :

> In present time if anyone is to be blamed for this predicament, it is the U.S. & NATO countries who are failing to take the notice of this grave situation( by not reining muslim countries like Saudi Arabia ,Pakistan & some other Arab countries, who are openly funding these Islamists )<

I agree as to who is to blame for the plight non-Mahometans are now in but for quite a different reason. The US and NATO are of course the main culprits, but not at all for "failing to take the notice of this grave situation" but for for a much much graver evil. Over the last 60 or more years they have been making with single-minded obstinacy of Mahometanism a perfect evil terror machine it is now. Everywhere they have financed,armed,trained and supported Mahometan terrorists and their organizations. They have always been behind their agenda for narrow egoistic and doctrinal reasons like hatred of communism, hatred of Arab nationalism and, of course , love of oil. Take a look at Rober Dreyfuss' study "Devil's Game: How the United States helped unleash Fundamentalist Islam" to get a better understanding of how and why this bloody Mahometan monstrosity has been created,cherished and promoted by the US and its front regimes.

The saddest thing about it all is, though , that until now the American power elites have ever faced, admited, let alone repented in public the evil they have done ! But why should they?They are still playing actively their old Devil's Game as events in Libya and Syria clearly show and no doubt they hope to play it one more time on a grand scale against China and Russia !

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".