69 million page views

A word to the wise

Reader comment on item: Should the West Be Supporting Syria's Assad?
in response to reader comment: It is not for our interests rebels to take over Syria.

Submitted by Martin (United States), Apr 18, 2013 at 23:05

I have read the basis of Mr. Pipes decision and noted it is firmly grounded in modern decision theory, the mathematical study of strategies for optimal decision-making between options involving different risks or expectations of gain. There are several rational ways of making a decision under uncertainty. The wise decision rule when faced with several unpleasant alternatives, by empirical logic, if not intuitively self-evident, is to select the strategy that will minimize the maximum losses that could occur, if losses do occur, had you made a decision in any other way. Put another way, select the alternative for which your regret will be the minimum over any other alternative you might have chosen. Mr. Pipes is simply pointing out we will have far fewer regrets with Mr. Asad being preoccupied internally with Syria than with the risk of another agitated Islamic state seeking to overrun the world. Is there any reason why we cannot seem to put a stop to that sort of political development once and for all so that we all might go back to living more or less peaceful lives without the spook of militant Islam haunting our waking moments.

The reader may recall Homer advising Sailors to sail closer to Scylla, than Charybdis since Charybdis could drown his whole ship: Better to keep your ship than lose your entire crew, Odysseus was warned. Even so, Scylla managed to catch six of his men, devouring them alive. At least it was only six.

In similar vein will Americans have fewer regrets after 3 years if they establish a decision rule that says whatever Mr. Obama proposes do -- or do the opposite?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (8) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
'Rebels' are not Syrian [246 words]rw talbotMay 5, 2013 22:47205848
1Syrian war update [36 words]JohnMay 5, 2013 09:47205837
Lion can handle.. [45 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
EugeneApr 22, 2013 16:13205454
3Why help the Saudi backed rebels? [245 words]DanielApr 19, 2013 14:26205299
An outstanding Historian with white glasses is a perfect Adviser to the President [285 words]Peter KikareasApr 19, 2013 22:35205299
1The Saudi Arabian Connection [240 words]JimApr 21, 2013 11:41205299
1It is not for our interests rebels to take over Syria. [79 words]Peter KikareasApr 17, 2013 23:51205262
1A word to the wise [275 words]MartinApr 18, 2013 23:05205262

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)