Clueless Lisa Wangsness strikes again!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 20, 2013 at 08:28

Dr. Pipes

I wanted to share with you and the readers this article in the Boston Globe by Ms Wangsness and the title of the article is "Islam might have had secondary rule in Boston attacks" Sobhanallah she just discovered it!

And here is the link

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/04/19/scholars-caution-against-drawing-easy-religious-conclusions-about-suspects-boston-marathon-bombings/a5Iucv4ntQHgSvXchQqKOM/story.html

But again this poor journalist tells us that "But scholars cautioned Friday against concluding that the Tsarnaeves' motives were purely religious."

Notice that she never identifies those scholars and if their motives were not religious then what were their motives? and if Islam as she seems to be saying played only a secondary rule then what is the prime motive of these criminals? She never tells us

Then she goes on and report what one can find in social media without proper examination of the evidence provided and we readers can find with ease and without the help of this poor journalist

What a horrible journalist

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".