Motivation? Hatred

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Apr 23, 2013 at 01:23

You merely waste time on petty insults . . . and meaningless diatribe. It seems your motivation is Hatred and Prejudice - that is why your replies tend to be full of petty insults . . . but of more concerning - POOR - badly written and argued.

What does this even mean?

"You are not even funny"

- - -

"1. Clueless Lisa Wangsness wrote that she spoke to SCHOLARS! It is plural so who are they?"

TRY READING:

"local Islamic leaders decried the attack in the ­strongest terms.

'Our hearts and prayers remain with the victims, the wounded, and their families.'

Quote Icon

"Neither suspect has been to Yusuf Mosque, nor would any such individuals be welcome here," said Imam Ibrahim ­Rahim, leader of the mosque in Brighton. "Our hearts and prayers remain with the victims, the wounded, and their families.""

- - -

"2. Then we are provided with the name of a certain Toft but what are her qualifications that allows her to dish out an opinion? You will not find it and how do you know what this Tuft is not one of the cleaning ladies at Oxford University or where she is working? you do not know!"

Again READ!

"said Monica Duffy Toft, a professor at the University of Oxford."

http://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/monica-toft

- - -

"3. Even if we are to read what this certain Tuft is saying she is saying that it is a form of nationalism so what does this have to do with Boston? Let me help you nothing because she does not tell us"

Someone with some intelligence would figured out what the Chechnyan connection means . . .

- - -

"4. Then this so called expert tells us that it is self styled jihadism but she never explains the why so in the convoluted world of the clueless Ms Wangsness this is why the rule of islam is secondary! Sobhanallah we got it! What a fake!"

Another meaningless question . . . if she was to answer such question - article would far exceed its scope. And the article is by Wangsness - and not Toft. You have confused the two well.

Another article DOES NOT have to answer everything that comes into your mind. . . .

- - -

"5. Then this Ms Tuft pontificates that these two poor souls had a hard time getting used to American life! Where is the evidence? as a matter of fact the evidence that we have is that thses two losers did fit very well"

Wrong - as Toft never says . . ."poor soul" anywhere - this is simply your colouring. This remark is self-evidently illogical and erroneous. . . if they fitted that well . . . then is it the American way to kill?

[Which it might be - given the level of gun & violent crime in USA]

- - -

"Now do you see why silence is golden our dear Amin al-tablighee?"

As I have COMPREHENSIVELY exposed your stupidity - then you should have taken your own advice and stayed er . . . "Golden"

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".