Clueless Lisa Wangsness strikes again and our dear Amin the lost tablighee

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 22, 2013 at 06:50

Our dear Amin whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by islam just like what happened in Boston is trying to help clueless Ms Wangsness so let us see

Try reading the article. . . she doesn't spoon feed it -

You are not even funny

but the clues are there:

Clues provided by clueless Ms Wagnsness? let us see

"I think these are two young men who never adapted," Toft said. "It's a combination of ­nationalism mixed with self-styled jihadism, and some young men who had a hard time adapting to American culture."

Again if you believe than an Arabian warlord and caravan raider spoke to an Arabia deity via an angel or that Mizra Ghulam who died in a bathroom from diarrhea spoke to Allah too you can believe anything

Mr Einsetin:

1. Clueless Lisa Wangsness wrote that she spoke to SCHOLARS! It is plural so who are they?

2. Then we are provided with the name of a certain Toft but what are her qualifications that allows her to dish out an opinion? You will not find it and how do you know what this Tuft is not one of the cleaning ladies at Oxford University or where she is working? you do not know!

3. Even if we are to read what this certain Tuft is saying she is saying that it is a form of nationalism so what does this have to do with Boston? Let me help you nothing because she does not tell us

4. Then this so called expert tells us that it is self styled jihadism but she never explains the why so in the convoluted world of the clueless Ms Wangsness this is why the rule of islam is secondary! Sobhanallah we got it! What a fake!

5. Then this Ms Tuft pontificates that these two poor souls had a hard time getting used to American life! Where is the evidence? as a matter of fact the evidence that we have is that thses two losers did fit very well

Now do you see why silence is golden our dear Amin al-tablighee?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".