Again the master of Taqqiya strikes again

Submitted by Peter Hall (Australia), Apr 20, 2013 at 22:48

Armin, PLEASE concentrate

I asked you very plainly, Where did I say I wanted to ban the burka??

Your response is another example of your frothing at the mouth avoidance; of a simple question!

"You do not have an argument - you are consistently rude and petty. You post long-winded insults.

Enjoy yourself . . . and you create pretenses of such like:

"it is a shame you cannot process the information presented. Where have I said I wanted to banned the burka?????? Where? Your limited imagination has run away with you again." "

Again I ask, where did I say I wanted to ban the burka???? I have not created a pretense! I asked you a question based on your accusation that I want to ban the burka.

Obviously you either cannot understand a simple question or you are deliberately avoiding it.

I ask again, for a 4th time, where do I state that I want to ban the burka??

Now once again I am not sure it is your inability to concentrate or you just being ignorant but really Amin. Why won't you answer a very simple question. Is it that you cannot answer without lying? That you cannot admit you are wrong?

You said

"Swastika is one symbol - Nazis simply adopted the Hindu version. The symbol is the same. You cannot ban it. And that is it. Germany have NOT banned the symbol. Simply its intended use."

That doesnt make sense. really? So you cannot tell the difference between a Nazi Swastika and a Hindu one? Really? So you are not cognitive enought to differentiate that I keep referring to the Nazi Swastika, which Germany has banned, and not the Hindu Swastika which you keep trying to cloud the issue with.

For your information, Germany has Banned the Nazi Swastika. You cannot display it in Public with certain exceptions which are limited. Get your facts right.

Where have I ever stated the Hindu swastika was banned? You keep making the most idiotic statements and lie, yet you do not expect to be held accountable for the stupid lies and inaccuracies you say?

Again you prove a point in the most laughable way.

I said

"Muslims may be totally insensitive as to how their actions and traditions are offensive to non Muslims."

Then you say

"This is thoroughly idiotic . . . . who gives a fig about being insensitive to Westerners? "

So I said Muslims can be insensitive to non Westerns, you then say my comment was idiotic, and then you confirm the exact thing I claimed.

What an idiot, to use your words, pointing out your many contradictions. It is like shooting fish in a barrel!

So you are saying only an idiot would say Muslims are insensitive to others? Or are you the idiot who just claimed to "not give a fig about Western sensitivities"

Again I ask you to try and concentrate and think before you embarass yourself further.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".