The failed state of Pakistan and wannabe Arabs!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 1, 2013 at 15:47

Our dear Bilawal the wannabe Arab realizing that his little game has been exposed he is changing his screen name and I wonder why

For the readers our dear Bilawal tells us kuffar that in response to my claim that Pakistan is a failed state according to the wikipedia page that happens to have lots of references that Pakistan is indeed a failed state

So what was his bogus response? He told us kuffar that wikipedia is not a good source to prove a point but guess what? His sources to refute my point that Pakistan is a fialed state were from wikipedia and this means that he either does not read his references before posting them or he realized that we kuffar read what he posts and in this case he was hoping that we kuffar will not read what he posted which makes you our deal Bilawal the wannabe Arab and you must pardon me a poorly educated man so are you a poorly educated man our dear Bilawal?

I respond you this way ...

Oh I'm waiting for this one

My Ancestors werent hindus at all.

And you are even ashamed of your own ancestors and why is that? Oh it must be the Arabian imperialism right our dear Bilawal?

And Dimmi NO more ,I have shared information but I still don't trust Wikipedia,

Our dear Bilawal who changed his screen name is saying that: "I Bilawal the wannabe Arab used wikipedia to prove my point but wikipedia is a poor source of information!" Is this what you are saying our dear Bilawal the wannabe Arab?

If so then I will leave this pathetic remark to the readers to judge you and judge your poor madrassa education

there are one hundred more sites that will be affirming whatever I shared. one sentence for you ...

I read this as you have been exposed as a poorly educated Pakistani and this is why Pakistan is a failed state

Thank you our dear Bilawal for proving my point

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".