Reply to Mr. Pipes Sept.23, 2013.

Submitted by Martin (Canada), Sep 23, 2013 at 09:06

I fully agree with the first comment.

The second comment is highly debatable. What, Mr. Pipes, would you consider a "convincing" apology from Mahmoud Abass? Hmmm? Furthermore, since you characterize John Kerry's negotiations as farcical, why do you only suggest they be only suspended rather than ended? Why do you think Israel is so beholden to the Obama regime that putting a final end to the Oslo farce is not an option. What will a cosmetic interruption accomplish? Nothing, in my humble opinion.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".