69 million page views

Petulant Islamic groups

Reader comment on item: Banned in the British Library

Submitted by Prashant (United States), Apr 9, 2014 at 02:10

Dear Dr Pipes,

Probably some very vocal British Islamic organization (like our own CAIR) managed to twist the arms of the British Library and of the politicians who manage the affairs of the library to block your sites from being accessed from the library. The politicians of free democracies constitute a compromised lot. These poor guys have to win elections and they cannot give the impression that they are prejudiced against any group. So they have to listen to every single demand of any one who has time to scream and demand. The petulant Islamic groups take the maximum advantage of this situation. The Jews, the Hindus, the Christians, in fact, most of the humanity would rather be competitive, pursue creative goals, and make money than spend all their time defending any given ideology at all costs. But the petulant Islamic groups have no such luxury to afford. They do not have to invent, win Nobel prizes, or fight poverty. They can spend all their time in defending their ideology. I hope you succeed in getting the ban on your site removed but that is only a small thing.

I think the days of petulant Islam are now numbered and that is the big thing. In this age of mass communication a lot is being written about Islam. And, I am certain, people in the Islamic world are able to read all that is being written. The questions that the free world is raising for the Islamists are bound to draw the attention of million of people in the Islamic world. Some of these people are bound to get convinced themselves and start asking their own questions. They will also find that defending an ideology against someone else's thought or speech is not worth it. It is more expensive to curb other people's thoughts than to just let the thoughts flow and die their own deaths if they are wrong.

The petulant Islam that uses the freedom of speech and thought in the free world to curb the same freedom is not going to survive for too long. It was easy in the 1980s to issue a threat for Salman Rushdie and get his book banned but it will not be so easy in the 2000s to threaten everyone who can write on a blog and get the blog banned. It will not be worth the cost anyway. So, worry not Dr Pipes, no one has to go to the British Library to read your blog and enough people are reading your blog the world over.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
This reminds me of the rats frantically jumping suicidally into the river [74 words]CarolJun 2, 2014 09:51215203
5The Economist also blocked my comments [309 words]Ellen PopperApr 20, 2014 20:02214568
title [16 words]MubarakApr 17, 2014 09:28214526
Outrageous! [14 words]RichardApr 15, 2014 06:20214486
"The End of Evangelical Support for Israel?" [531 words]Michael S.Apr 12, 2014 13:59214439
5A poem inspired by Daniel Pipes, "Banned in the British Library" [122 words]Martin IngallApr 9, 2014 16:14214394
Banned In The British Library [5 words]JudithJun 18, 2014 14:12214394
1Very disturbing and disappointing [22 words]Dean M.Apr 9, 2014 13:54214392
2blocked by who [130 words]mythApr 9, 2014 06:30214386
1Petulant Islamic groups [426 words]PrashantApr 9, 2014 02:10214384
shutting down discussion against the right conservative in favor the hate filled islamist agenda [77 words]rodney allsworthApr 8, 2014 23:48214383
The Intolerance of the tolerant hypocrites [104 words]NHConstitutionalistApr 8, 2014 23:40214382
Ever the romantic, Daniel - You wrote and requested? (chuckle) [187 words]kmanApr 8, 2014 22:36214381
Banned by the QUEEN [67 words]Peter knopflerApr 8, 2014 18:57214380
It's good to be special [23 words]Doug MayfieldApr 8, 2014 17:55214376
Websites blocked in error - now unblocked [53 words]British Library Press OfficeApr 8, 2014 17:44214375
Outrage [8 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David H. PartingtonApr 8, 2014 17:26214373
What's goin' on? [199 words]john w. mcginleyApr 8, 2014 16:47214371
Large government vs small government [35 words]OldmanRickApr 8, 2014 15:58214370
Truth and Honor. [17 words]EthanPApr 8, 2014 14:44214369
How can we challenge moderate Muslims for not resisting Islamism if British Crown has surrendered. [32 words]PhiliorApr 8, 2014 14:31214368
2The British ought to change detrumental archaic Policies [100 words]Michael Hanni MorcosApr 8, 2014 13:04214366
Internet censorship is gearing up elsewhere too [95 words]Abu NudnikApr 8, 2014 12:58214365
Good manners of informal polyvalence [65 words]ZhingisenderApr 8, 2014 12:32214364
2To all those people living in the Land of Oz [221 words]Robin RosenblattApr 8, 2014 12:16214362
On the mark!!!!! [2 words]froikeJun 15, 2014 15:11214362

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)