|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reaction to Islamist attacks on cartoonistsReader comment on item: Images, not Words, Most Disturb Islamists Submitted by Richard H. Shulman (United States), Jan 16, 2015 at 21:47 WNET declined to publish the latest cartoons mocking Muhammad. Its stated reason is that it is more offensive than newsworthy. That reaction misses the point. The point is that Islamists are in jihad, a total war against civilization. They claim to be insulted by any criticism, however truthful. Any critical statement they find offensive. So should we stifle all critical discussion of Islam? Then they win. Meanwhile, their discussions and sermons insult other religions. Should we tell them before they ask us to withhold statements against their religion, they should withold statements against other religions? Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (19) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |