Tariq Ramadan must be reading a different Qur'an correspondants

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jan 19, 2015 at 12:13

Dr Pipes

Tariq Ramadan was dishing out his usual Islamic propaganda on NPR's "On Point" where he was interviewed by Tom Ashbrook and here is the link

http://onpoint.wbur.org/2015/01/19/charlie-hebdo-european-diversity-islam-judaism-emmigration

What is really amazing is that Tariq Ramadan tells us kuffar that chopping of heads is not in the Qur'an which is not true as you will find it in Surat Muhammad verse 3 and if you insult MUhammad or Allah then you will be declared as a kafir and be killed and for this see Q9:64:66 and let us not forget that the god of Islam tells his followers in Surat al-Anfal to terrorize non Muslims and to loot what they have and enslave them and rape slave women (as in the case of the Yazidis) and tax the so called ahl al-kitab the mafia tax called al-Jizya

Oh the warm and fuzzy Islam

All of the above as per Tariq Ramadan has no foundation in the Qur'an which means that we kuffar must be reading a different Qur'an or he is not telling us the truth which I supect is the case.

As for Tom Ashbrook and I respect him but he should have the guts to takeTariq Ramadan to task for uttering this nonsense but I do not blame him he most likely has no clue about what the Qur'an really says but this should not be an excuse

Oh correspondents at NPR are now calling Muslim terrorists: Jihadists! but they never explain to the listeners that the word Jihadi means holy warrior!

Oh darn it I thought that there is no such thing in Islam and that Jihad means striving to improve oneself which makes a Jihadi a seeker of knowledge and inner growth!

As for Tariq Ramadan he has no shame

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".