69 million page views

Too Soon for Populists to Become Part of the Political Process

Reader comment on item: In Defense of Europe's So-called Far Right

Submitted by FactsRule (United States), Jan 19, 2015 at 18:35

The TEA Party is an example of how not to attempt to join the established political system too early. Now, they're not only tarnished, but frequently wasting money running against establishment Republicans & trying to change the Republican establishment with little success. Gatherings and rallies should have continued to grow & gain strength. They would have been able to insist that the media focus on the TEA Party theme of saving America from out-of-control governments at all levels. This would have resulted in a far larger base of newly educated people who would have been a greater more effective voting demographic that would have grown far faster after some additional momentum than has been the case.

Instead, the movement suffers from continuously being mischaracterized & maligned from every angle. The greatest obstacle to the TEA Party has been the establishment Republican Party. The later is more concerned with personal enrichment & kicking the can than about beginning the daunting task of popping the economic bubble created by the Federal Reserve. Individuals have tried with some, but not much, success to run for political office. But, since they are a minority in Congress, they are a target for ridicule more than an effective force for necessary change that the Republican establishment is so reluctant to make.

In Europe, the establishment is too concerned about the feelings of 50-70 million Muslims to do anything to save their countries from looming doom.
Concerning proof of this looming doom can be seen by watching the compelling 48-minute inside look at supposedly moderate Islamic mosques in the UK, Dispatches: Undercover Mosque, www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJk_AiK-4No

So, while I agree with you, Daniel, I think it early to stop the attention-getting & the accompanying education that growing numbers of attendees gain.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (31) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Hypocrisy of many far-right partis about anti-semitism [21 words]Yael F.Jan 31, 2015 13:41220799
1Dr. Pipes - How can we perceptionally divorce Religion from Ideology? [778 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Warren D. Peac eJan 30, 2015 07:37220774
1"The populist Pandora's box is open" by René Cuperus [64 words]LudvikusJan 30, 2015 00:41220772
Hope for the moderates [65 words]PermReaderJan 22, 2015 09:34220598
Do they care about their children? [145 words]y Brandstetter MDJan 22, 2015 00:54220587
4Not Mel Brooks, but Lutz Bachmann, as Adolf Hitler, still isn't acceptible in Germany these days [147 words]LudvikusJan 21, 2015 18:24220573
2The Urban Legends of Moderate Islam and the Integration of Muslims in Western Society [2076 words]Warren.D.PeaceJan 21, 2015 05:39220545
Defense Cannot be Appropriated Through Placating the Enemy [338 words]M. ToveyJan 27, 2015 15:38220545
Lack of imagination [728 words]Warren D PeaceFeb 1, 2015 10:10220545
No Imagination Necessary from Biblical Perspective [794 words]M. ToveyFeb 4, 2015 13:34220545
1Right-Wing Support For Putin A Mistake [137 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DaveJan 20, 2015 19:29220531
agree [34 words]Gita RaymerJan 20, 2015 18:09220530
1Half-way There [328 words]Ron ThompsonJan 20, 2015 13:24220516
Nazis were also left wing [120 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Pam SiegfriedJan 20, 2015 12:15220512
Le Pen should publicly denounce the Vichy Regime first to remove all doubt [63 words]PezDispenserJan 20, 2015 08:08220506
how the collapse of social democracy and legacy liberal parties relate to the far right [431 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
mythJan 20, 2015 05:43220503
1problems with Jobbik [197 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
JeffreyJan 19, 2015 20:30220494
1Too Soon for Populists to Become Part of the Political Process [292 words]FactsRuleJan 19, 2015 18:35220488
Islamists are the Ones with "Anti-Republic Values" [23 words]AlexJan 19, 2015 18:22220487
Is common sense common? [73 words]steven LJan 19, 2015 17:29220485
"Radical Islam" [136 words]George KeselmanJan 19, 2015 17:01220483
1America's Democratic Party was until 50 years ago the party of state-enforced anti-black racism [233 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Alec RawlsJan 19, 2015 15:44220481
United Kingdom Independence Party [103 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ian FilesJan 19, 2015 14:57220480
That's also not true of the French NF [173 words]R. CraigenJan 19, 2015 22:16220480
Thanks for writing this [156 words]Benjamin R.Jan 19, 2015 14:53220479
Do NOT Expect... [15 words]kauf buchJan 19, 2015 14:40220478
3Assimilation of New Immigrants is Absolutely Necessary for a Peaceful Nation [284 words]Domenic PepeJan 19, 2015 14:31220477
What joy! [42 words]ECAWJan 19, 2015 14:21220476
Embracing Insurgents [98 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Stephen H. ChopekJan 19, 2015 13:43220474
2Survival, life, is the ultimate value [109 words]Doug MayfieldJan 19, 2015 12:54220472
1Islam [88 words]TKListJan 19, 2015 11:57220469

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)