From twitter land Kecia Ali and Tarek Masoud and last Leila Fadel of NPR

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 4, 2015 at 17:42

Dr Pipes

When we think that we have heard it all we realize that there is more nonsense in store and I will made it brief because readers can check it on twitter

1. Clueless Ms Kecia Ali justifies slavery in Islam and raping of slaves and Da'ish is not Islamic and does she care about the rape of Yazidi women in the name of her Allah and she calls herself a feminist she does not even care in the least and here is an article about it and you judge for youself

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kecia-ali/islam-sex-slavery_b_8004824.html

Shameful and this is what the students at Boston University get back for paying $50,000 dollars in tuition fees

2. Prof Tarek Masoud of Harvard tells us that Da'ish is not really Islamic it is more like the pagans of Mecca amazing for a Harvard professor to utter this nonsense oh and it gets better he tells his clueless followers that he says so because of all people Karen Armstrong wrote so in her horrible biography of Muhammad and when he was reminded why would he suggest as reference Ms Armstrong book but not Ibn Ishaq or al-Tabari or al-Waqidi you never get an answer

And the ole Professor does not realize that al-Tabari tells us that the pagans of Mecca rejected Muhammad because he did not make any sense

3. Last and worst is Ms Leila Fadel whose salary is paid by us who support NPR and she reports from Cairo and who agreed with Prof Masoud bizarre remark which means that she is not a reporter anymore stating facts and only facts and to add insult to injury she blocks any poster that happens to disagree with her

I hope that you can pass this on to Raymond Ibrahim there is a real story here

I will expand on the pagans of Mecca from Islamic sources and debunk Tarek Masoud's little theory

This is just unbelievable

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".