|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accept or co-opt?Reader comment on item: Accepting Europe's Anti-Immigration Parties Submitted by Dan Simon (United States), Nov 30, 2017 at 02:33 You briefly mention an obvious potential alternative: a mainstream party (or perhaps more than one) in each country could embrace a platform that includes tighter immigration restrictions, and thus immediately tap into the popular hunger for such policies, leading to greatly enhanced electoral success. Is there any reason not to expect mainstream parties to do that to head off gains from populist alternatives? And is there any reason not to prefer this more stable, competent alternative?I al Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Daniel Pipes replies: Yes, read it again; I wrote about this. More at http://www.danielpipes.org/17100/europe-epochal-elections Reader comments (19) on this item
![]() |
![]() Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |