President George W. Bush is right on target

Submitted by conservativechick14 (United States), Oct 13, 2005 at 23:01

Heck, none of you may even take me seriously because I'm fourteen. People can nod, and smile, and say "She can't possibly know what she's talking about." But I can assure you of many things, all of which are biased from my kill-the-terrorist point of view. ...

1) TERRORISTS ARE BAD. got that so far? they want to kill every american "infidel", down to the last woman and child. Not to mention you liberals as well. Haven't you noticed that radical islamic fundamentalists are trying to force ONE religion, ONE system, ONE way of life, down your throats? Despite what you may hear about the so-called "religion of peace", it's not exactly the "free, peace, make-love-not-war, save the whales, screw the unborn children, seperation-of-church-and-state" nirvana that you liberals claim to love. In fact, all "infidels" who enter the temple in Mecca are killed on sight for violating "religious laws". Seperation of church and state, yeah right.

2) APPEASEMENT GETS US NOWHERE.

Had George Bush gone through the UN approved method of "talk to him peacefully, negotiate, maybe after ten years he'll change his mind" method, Saddam Hussien would have already killed another 900,000. Mayhap from America. So far, 2000 american soldiers have died. you... are trying to tarnish the cause they have DIED for by calling this a "vietnam quagmire." In vietnam, 250,000+ men died. After only three years, we have captured Hussein, killed his sons (who were executioners and rapists: strange that doesn't bug the feminists), eliminated heads of radical terrorist organizations, and scared the ... out of osama bin laden so much that he won't even poke his ugly head out his warm, safe cave. I think we've done pretty well without appeasement.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".