Official support

Submitted by Samniels (Germany), Jan 4, 2022 at 06:03

Washington Post supported Jamal Khashoggi, nephew of an arm dealer and former jihadist married to a Turkish veiled woman. How could he pretend to be pro-democracy in Saudi Arabia while supporting Islamic suprematism in (formerly) secular Turkey?
Ilhan Omar, close to CAIR, has never questioned Islam in her native Somalia: slavery trade, FGM, illiteracy, and rape being its usual features.
CAIR and Washington Post support Rohingyas in Myanmar: they occupy a strategic land in which the Chinese planned to build a port on the Indic Ocean. They cannot claim citizenship unless their ancestors arrived before 1824. CAIR and Washington Post omit to talk about the slaughter of Hindus, Buddhists and other minorities in Bangladesh - the home country of Rohingyas.
In Europe, the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the European Council and the European Parliament with the help of Open Society Foundation. Why such organization is supporting a suprematist Islamic sect?
Journalists that published articles denouncing this sect have changed side or stopped writing about it. Why?
Both the Clintons and the Bushes have done businesses with the sect, even when Osama Bin Laden and other notorious terrorists were members of the brotherhood.
So, is the establishment supporting the brotherhood as a fabricated enemy of the West?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".