Imputing to 'Palestine' Conditions of Legitimacy Without True Legal Standing

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Jul 26, 2022 at 13:01

Claiming legitimacy of an Islamic connection to the Temple Mount by using a plagiarized name of Roman descent does not have the same level of authority than like saying, Mecca is the center of Islamic life (even with the asserted importance of the Hajj) all the while still trying to appropriate the Temple Mount when all surviving evidence indicates Jewish ownership and not Islamic. Islam's claim is still antichronilogical; their actions in attempting to remove the Jewish archeological evidence when the Jewish State continued in its rebirthing process is proof enough that even Muslims really know the truth, but deny it for controversy's sake.
There is no free thinking for Mecca's sake any more than freethinking in 'Palestinian' terms is allowed amongst Israel's enemies.
Thus, the delusion of 'Palestine' remains and payment for this error is on the horizon. Its fuse is already lit, the only question remaining is how long will it take unless someone recoginzes the error and attempt to stop it. According to the written Hebrew prophets, it should not take a scholar to figure it out.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".