69 million page views

Problematic Comparison

Reader comment on item: How Consequential Are 9/11 Conspiracy Theories?

Submitted by Alan Forrester (United Kingdom), Aug 18, 2006 at 13:30

I think there is a problem with the comparison between the Kennedy assassinologists and 9/11 conspiracy buffs. The American government didn't have to do anything about the Kennedy assassination as it was not a matter of deliberate policy on anyone's part to fund Oswald to assassinate Kennedy. The Kennedy assassination therefore was not part of the argument for an important piece of foreign policy, but 9/11 is part of the argument for the War on Islamism.

People who believe some 9/11 conspiracy theory will presumably vote for parties that don't favour the war, like the Democrats. Perhaps the 9/11 conspiracy buffs are in the group that would already vote for parties that don't favour the war, in which case they aren't a problem as far as getting the right foreign policy is concerned, but what if they're not?

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (13) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Truth about the "truthers" their real HATE motives (Part 2) [132 words]GinaDec 8, 2010 22:12180797
2'WhatReallyHappened's truther: Michael Rivero - true Nazi - exposed [Motive to lie!] [421 words]GinaDec 4, 2010 22:14180707
Truth [5 words]TonyMar 2, 2011 13:02180707
1Reason for Questions [296 words]collegegirlMar 7, 2007 01:1980630
Problematic Comparison [138 words]Alan ForresterAug 18, 2006 13:3053369
Stupidity is Endemic [35 words]David SabghirAug 18, 2006 00:4653306
It is amazing, startling, or dangerous? [40 words]Frank VeranoAug 17, 2006 17:3953268
dkrieger@usc.edu [37 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Diane KriegerAug 17, 2006 15:0253244
Moussaoui at the British Library [94 words]DianeAug 17, 2006 19:0253244
Surrender To Whom? [59 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Thomas QuiganAug 17, 2006 14:5353243
Speaking of Conspiracy Theories... [151 words]Dan NewitAug 15, 2006 01:0452863
1TRUTH IS ONE; THE SAGES SPEAK OF IT BY MANY NAMES... [601 words]Lamont CranstonMar 10, 2007 19:1052863
Legitimate distrust causes false conspiracy theories to catch on among a minority [256 words]Adam HollandAug 13, 2006 00:5752548

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)